Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is raw fish considered muktza?

share|improve this question
1  
See also mi.yodeya.com/questions/4036 –  msh210 Feb 9 '11 at 16:03
add comment

2 Answers

The shulhan aruch writes that raw meat isnt muske because people it that way. Rav Yitshak Yosef wries that it depends what the minhag haolam is by meat. If people it raw nowadays than its not mukse if not than it is. I would imagine the same applies to fish.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Aruch HaShulchan OH 308:57 quotes the Rambam that (raw) unsalted fish cannot be touched.

סימן שח סעיף נז עוד כתב שם: "מטלטלין בשר תפוח, והיינו מסריח, מפני שהוא מאכל לחיה. ומטלטלין בשר חי בין תפל בין מליח מפני שראוי לאדם, וכן דג מליח. אבל התפל - אסור לטלטלו" עכ"ל. ואצלינו שאין חיות מצויות - אסור לטלטל בשר תפוח, אבל הטור והש"ע סעיף ל"א כתבו: מפני שראוי לכלבים, וכלבים מצוים בכל מקום ומותר לטלטלו, והרמב"ם נקיט לשון הגמרא (קכ"ח:) ע"ש. ועל הטור וש"ע יש לומר שבזמן הגמרא היו חיות מצויות, לפיכך אומר: מפני שהוא מאכל לחיה, ובזמן הטור וש"ע לא היו מצויות, לפיכך כתבו לכלבים (ק"נ שם), אבל לא כן משמע לשון הגמרא ע"ש. ואמנם בתוספות שם פירשו דתפוח אינו מסריח אלא הוא בשר תפל, וכן הוא בפירוש רש"י שברי"ף ע"ש וצ"ע (ועיין דרישה).

share|improve this answer
7  
consult your local Orthodox rabbi, though. This Aruch Hashulchan was written before sushi became popular. It could be that nowadays, this new metzius would cause a corresponding halachic change. Just as the Aruch Hashulchan was speaking of changed metzius from the times of the gemara. –  josh waxman Feb 9 '11 at 15:39
    
Josh thats what intrigues me about this particular question I want to know if any Modern responsa or Rav or Shiur addresses it? –  SimchasTorah Feb 9 '11 at 23:19
    
not that i know of... –  josh waxman Feb 11 '11 at 1:09
    
It did not address the muktza issue, but there was an article in the Journal of Halacha & Contemporary Society on the preparation of sushi on shabbat. The article concludes that producing a well constructed maki roll constitutes boneh, and is therefore prohibited. I cannot disagree more. –  Ze'ev Felsen Jun 28 '11 at 15:49
2  
@sam, muktza is based on a mental state. If I think, "well, I'm not going to use this" it becomes muktza. If in the past there was no use for raw fish, it was by default muktza. If I had a freshly caught salmon nowadays, and the skills and inclination to make sushi from it, it seemingly would not be muktza. –  Ze'ev Felsen Sep 19 '12 at 14:12
show 2 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.