Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The word זועה appears six times in tanach:

  1. Yeshayahu 28:19
  2. Yirmiyahu 15:4
  3. Yirmiyahu 24:9
  4. Yirmiyahu 29:18
  5. Yirmiyahu 34:17
  6. Divrei Hayamim II 29:8

In each one of these instances except the first, the kri is זעוה while the ksiv is זועה. (The linked text unfortunately does not bring the ksiv =]). In modern Hebrew, the word is pronounced זועה as the ksiv, which always struck me as an error. However on Tisha B'av we read the Kinna אש תוקד בקירבי written by Rabbi Avraham Ibn Ezra, in which appears the phrase: שריקות ותרועות וקולות וזועות בצאתי מירושלים. The rhyme of the poem, in which the end of each phrase rhymes with the end of the one before it (there is probably a more professional way of describing this) only works if the word is read "zva'ot" and not "za'avot", in order to rhyme with תרועות, מִגְבָּעוֹת and נִקְבָּעוֹת. This would seem to rehabilitate the modern Hebrew usage, seeing as there is a precedent in rabbinic literature for using the ksiv form as oppose to the kri. My questions are:

  • Are there any other such examples of usage of the ksiv as opposed to the kri form of a word in our traditional literature (both specifically regarding this word and also generally regarding others)?
  • What is the nature of the relationship between kri and ksiv with regards to what the "real" form of the word is supposed to be?

Please provide sources =]

As an interesting addendum, the word זעוה itself appears twice in Tanach:

  1. Devarim 28:25
  2. Yechezkel 23:46
share|improve this question
    
Re "other such examples of usage of the ksiv as opposed to the kri form of a word in our traditional literature": this is a use of the k'ri from Isaiah, though. So I don't see that this is a great example of what you seek. In other words, maybe what you seek doesn't exist at all. –  msh210 Aug 6 at 16:10
    
@msh210 in Isaiah there is no kri and ksiv; the word appears as זועה and is read as such. However this is the only such instance in Tanach, as in all other instances there is a kri זעוה, and the word זעוה itself appears twice. Thus Isaiah is the exception, not the rule –  Jewels Aug 7 at 16:16

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.