Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

When it comes to determining what counts as a chatzitzah for mikvah, we say that nails which are too long (the length that they would bother the person), then they have to be cut or they would constitute a chatzitza [citation needed]. Why don't we say the same when it comes to washing one's hands for bread, where chatzitzah is also an issue?

share|improve this question
1  
Perhaps because nidda is a matter of kareis, whereas washing for bread is d'rabbanan. –  Fred Jul 8 at 5:55
    
I was actually looking to see if anyone required it, as I remember seeing such an opinion. Thanks @DoubleAA –  Matt Jul 8 at 6:27

1 Answer 1

up vote 6 down vote accepted

The custom for women to trim their nails before going to the Mikva is recorded in Shulchan Arukh YD 198:18 but the reason given is related to avoiding dirt under the nail in the part of the nail which extends past the flesh. The Levush (ibid :18) there asks why this is not practiced by Netillat Yadayim. He gives two answers:

  • Men are not so particular about their nails, so dirt under the nail would not be a problem for them. Since the enactment of Netillat Yadayim was (apparently) primarily for men, the women get the same rules.

  • Women are not as careful about personal cleanliness during an average daily situation like eating bread as they are when going to a bathhouse to get all clean for the Mikva.

The Taz (ibid sk 19) gives another reason, namely, that since Netillat Yadayim is only rabbinic, we rely on the opinion of Rabbenu Tam that only certain kinds of very sticky/thick dirt create problems and we don't need to worry about people not noticing this under their nails.

The reason you stated for cutting nails is that of the Raavan as quoted in Shakh (ibid sk 25). However the Shakh ends up being lenient if the women did not fulfill this opinion of the Raavan and has already gone home from the Mikva and spent the night with her husband. It seems that certainly we can be lenient then in the case of the rabbinic Netillat Yadayim.

You should see the Beit Yosef YD 198:18 for more.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.