Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

Are there any sources that say explicitly that the Mashiach will NOT be a woman?

I am specifically asking about the person who is to be crowned Mashiach (either ben Yosef or ben David) at the end of days.

I am not referring to people who embodied attributes of mashiach in their respective times. As the students of the Vilna Gaon in Kol HaTor (2:8) have already suggested that women such as Queen Ester manifested MBY in her generation. (They also include other women such as Shifra and Puah (see Kol HaTor 2:2) Devorah (ibid can't remember where…) , Chuldah (ibid 2:75),

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Double AA Jun 13 at 13:24

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

    
@DoubleAA, should the two duplicate posts be merged? –  Isaac Moses Jun 13 at 14:17
    
@IsaacMoses I don't see anything new here that we'd need over there. Do you? –  Double AA Jun 13 at 14:20
    
@DoubleAA, merging could unite the best answer of the bunch (the one over there) with the better of the two questions (this one). –  Isaac Moses Jun 13 at 14:22
    
@DoubleAA Note that this question asks about mashiach ben Yosef also, whereas the other asks about just mashiach (presumably ben David). –  msh210 Jun 15 at 6:05
add comment

3 Answers 3

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The Moshiach is considered a King and the Halacha is as stated in the Rambam (Melachim 1:5)

enter image description here

(From Hebrewbooks.org)

Although this may not appear to directly answer your question of whether there are explicit references to a woman not being moshiach. However, the point is that a woman may not be crowned, so it is a halachic impossibility, and thus there would be no need to state it explicity.

share|improve this answer
    
I have edited your answer to make it a little bit clearer, in my opinion. But I think you might have missed an opportunity to argue more strongly that this actually is an explicit answer. A woman cannot be crowned king. Period. That's what the question is asking. Done. –  Seth J Jun 13 at 13:10
    
@seth j יישר כח –  Nafkamina Jun 13 at 13:11
    
How do you know this? What if they appoint her anyway. Would she not be a Queen? –  Double AA Jun 13 at 13:19
    
...the rambam which is qouted? i thought that was obvious –  Nafkamina Jun 13 at 13:20
2  
I dont see that at all in the question and even so thats definitly NOT what you are addressing –  Nafkamina Jun 13 at 13:40
show 6 more comments

I am not even addressing the Rambam and the rules that only a man can take the throne. That goes without saying. Since part of the definition of Mashiach is that he will take the throne and his children will continue to hold it, the mashiach cannot be a woman. However, I address other logic as well below.

Since the Mashiach will be a king and will have children who will be of the lineage of King David, then he cannot be a woman. The children of any women are of the lineage of the husband. Thus, since the next king must be a child of a king, then a queen's children would not be able to be of that lineage. The rules for a king are similar to those of a kohen.

I explained in another answer, which kings must Moshiach descend from?, how the Mashiach needs to be a descendant of Zerubavel because once each king takes the throne, then the lineage continues through him. The circumstance in which Tzidkiyahu became the king was very unusual and the Tanach does not even consider that the lineage could have continued with him. We also see with Athaliah that she was never considered legitimate when she killed all of her grandchildren (except for Yoash) even when it was not known that he was alive.

Since the lineage must be father to son from Zerubavel, then the queen and the king could not both be of the same lineage. Only one particular line from Zerubavel would have led to the mashiach. Once the mashiach is revealed, any one else (from a different line of fathers) would have been shown to be ineligible. For the king and queen to be of the correct lineage would make them brother and sister (even if from different mothers).

Note that the promise that the line would continue means that the mashiach would have children and the kingship would continue in his descendants.

Leadership (as with Devorah) is not inherited as opposed to kingship and kehuna..

share|improve this answer
2  
Thanks for the answer, sabbahillel. I humbly suggest that providing sources for your answer will improve its credibility and acceptability. –  Lee Jun 13 at 10:11
2  
is the fact that we refer to the person as "ben David" in, and of itself an answer? –  Danno Jun 13 at 10:54
3  
Why couldn't Mashiach's husband from the lineage of David? Then her children would also be of his lineage. –  Daniel Jun 13 at 11:14
    
Why must a king be the son if a king? Perhaps the next king will be her brother or nephew –  Double AA Jun 13 at 13:18
    
Who says Mashiah will have children? –  Seth J Jun 13 at 14:18
show 1 more comment

No, Moshiach is a King, and woman cannot halachically be a king

share|improve this answer
5  
This answer would be improved with the addition of a source. –  Monica Cellio Jun 13 at 12:54
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.