Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The order of berachot before eating foods are as follows (Mishna Berurah 211:35): HaMotzei, Mezonot, Hagafen, HaEtz, HaAdama, and Shehakol.

I seems as though the more חשוב the food is, the greater precedence it has and the more significant the after-beracha is.

Meat is considered a delicacy, a facilitator of (non-subjective) simcha (according to the Rambam, see here), is used in important korbanot, has many halachot regarding its preparation, has a higher level of 'soul' in comparison to inanimate vegetables (Ramchal), etc.

Quote from the Rambam (Hilchot Yom Tov 6:18), talking about simchat Yom Tov:

והאנשים, אוכלין בשר ושותין יין, שאין שמחה אלא בבשר, ואין שמחה אלא ביין.

Why then does meat not have a greater significance in terms of berachot?

share|improve this question
2  
Since at creation animals were not intended to be eaten we have to make a bracha about how Hashem creates everything,but we cannot call it it a food item intrinsically. –  sam Jun 13 at 0:18
1  
@sam Interesting. Do you have a source, or is this your own chiddush? –  Ypnypn Jun 13 at 3:00
    
sam is qouting the gemara (or possibly rav kook who promulgated this idea) –  Nafkamina Jun 13 at 12:14
    
Its a thought I have heard before,not my chiddush –  sam Jun 15 at 2:28

1 Answer 1

1) The fact that meat comes at the cost of killing an animal, we don't make a special Beracha. Similar to why we don't say Shehecheyanu by a Bris Milah because the child is in pain.

2) The animal itself gets its nourishment from vegetation, so in that sense it can't get a greater Beracha than its life source.

share|improve this answer
1  
Very interesting. Do you have any sources for what you are suggesting? –  AKayser Jun 18 at 4:43
    
plants get nourishment from the earth, yet plants have a greater bracha than earth (salt) –  Shmuel Brin Jun 18 at 5:13
1  
You could argue the opposite for point 1. That one Should say a more significant beracha to fulfil several obligations, which overrides the 'cost of killing'. Is this a term borrowed from somewhere? –  bondonk Jun 18 at 9:53

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.