Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What are the halakhic guidelines and limitations for using psukim from the Torah to heal illness? Does it make a difference if the psuk is being used to heal a "spiritual" malady which is believed to be causing the physical one? What if the psuk is being used as part of tikkun to rectify a sin which is causing the ailment?

share|improve this question
    
I assume the question is that the physical ailment indicate a spiritual issue which you wish to resolve and not that you are trying to indirectly heal the medical issue? –  YDK Nov 15 '10 at 2:00
    
Not necessarily. Again the question is what are the halakhic ramifications for any of the above. Actually I would say the opposite. In my experience the majority of the people are more worried about the physical malady, especially when stricken by a serious illness, and that will often lead them to seeking out tikkunim and segulot of various kinds. So my interest was in looking into the varying halakhic opinions and ramifications of that. –  Rabbi Michael Tzadok Nov 15 '10 at 8:23
    
kolhalashon.com/New/… see lecture #20 –  Hacham Gabriel Dec 20 '11 at 3:39

3 Answers 3

up vote 8 down vote accepted

Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh De'ah 179:5 (citing Sanhedrin 90a and 101a), states:

הלוחש על המכה או על החולה ורוקק ואחר כך קורא פסוק מן התורה אין לו חלק לעוה"ב ואם אינו רוקק איסורא מיהא איכא ואם יש בו סכנת נפשות הכל מותר.

תינוק שנפגע אין קורין עליו פסוק ואין מניחין עליו ס"ת.

"One who whispers over a wound or over a sick person, expectorates, and then reads a verse from the Torah, has no share in the World to Come. Even if he doesn't expectorate, it is still forbidden. But if the person's life is in danger, all of this is permitted.

"If a child [or an adult - Shach ibid. :12] has been injured, one may not recite a verse over him, nor place a Torah scroll on him."

Shach (ibid. :10) says that this primarily refers to using a verse containing G-d's name, because it is grossly disrespectful to associate that with spitting. So using a verse that doesn't contain any Divine name may just be forbidden (without incurring the penalty of losing his share in the World to Come).

Taz (ibid. :7) concurs. He goes on to say (ibid. :8) that the general rule is that "words of Torah were not given for the healing of the body, but for that of the soul," and that this is why this practice is prohibited, unless the person's life is in danger.

Finally, Shulchan Aruch (ibid. :10) says that all of this applies only when the person is already injured or ill, but that "a healthy person may recite verses to protect himself from destructive forces" - which, as Taz (ibid. :8) points out, is indeed the reason we recite the bedtime Shema.

share|improve this answer
    
Interesting... it goes against the Ma'aseh Rav of a great number of Rabbanim. –  Rabbi Michael Tzadok Nov 28 '10 at 16:29
    
Can you provide details? One obvious possibility is that in those cases the person's life was in danger, in which case the sources above say that it's fine. –  Alex Nov 28 '10 at 21:31
1  
The sefer Shiur Komah, published by Rav Shmuel Shmueli with haskamot from the Eida, Rav Kaduri, and a few others I can't remember right now, comes immediately to mind. Granted it states that the purpose is to make tikun so that the spiritual cause will be healed, thus allowing the body to be healed... I am not sure if that is a difference however. –  Rabbi Michael Tzadok Nov 29 '10 at 12:08
    
Does it have you saying the relevant verses right next to (or over) the sick person, or elsewhere? It's possible that על המכה or על התינוק, etc., are indeed meant in their narrowest sense - and in that case, saying them in another room wouldn't be a problem. (After all, it is pretty much a universal custom to say Tehillim for a sick person, and it's pretty hard to say that this would violate the above halachos.) –  Alex Nov 29 '10 at 17:48

The Rambam in Hilchot Avoda Zorah, Chapter 11, Law 13 (or 12 depending on edition) states:

יג [יב] הלוחש על המכה וקורא פסוק מן התורה, וכן הקורא על התינוק שלא ייבעת, המניח ספר תורה או תפילין על הקטן בשביל שיישן--לא דיי להן שהן בכלל חוברים ומנחשים: אלא שהן בכלל הכופרים בתורה, שהן עושין דברי תורה רפאות גוף, ואינן אלא רפאות נפשות, שנאמר "ויהיו חיים, לנפשך" (משלי ג,כב). אבל הבריא שקרא פסוקין או מזמור מתילים, כדי שתגן עליו זכות קריאתן, ויינצל מצרות ונזקים--הרי זה מותר.

"A person who says an incantation over a wound and recites a verse from the Torah, who recites a verse over a child so that he will not become scared, or who places a Torah scroll or tefillin over a baby so that it will sleep, not only is considered to be a soothsayer or one who cast spells. Furthermore, such people are included among those who deny the Torah, because they relate to the words of Torah as if they are cures for the body, when, in fact, they are cures for the soul, as [Proverbs 3:22] states: "And they shall be life for your soul. It is, however, permitted for a healthy person to read verses [from the Bible] or chapters from Psalms so that the merit of reading them will protect him and save him from difficulties and damage."

It would seem according to the Rambam, that to recite Pasukim (verses) to heal a person would be prohibited at all times. I would assume a כופר בתורה, would have no portion in the world to come as well.

It would further seem that to say Tehilim for a sick person would be problematic as well. Unless the person is learning the Tehilim to raise their level, and then engages in prayer. This is probably why we are accustomed to saying a Mishaberach after saying Tehilim on behalf of a sick person. In other words, the Tehilim function as a precursor or preparation for the person engaging in Prayer. Much like we do for Mincha by saying Ashrei before the Shmoneh Esreh.

share|improve this answer
    
I don't know if that's necessarily so. Both Rambam and Shulchan Aruch refer to saying a verse "over a wound," or "over a child," etc. - so perhaps it's only a problem if you're right there in the room with them. –  Alex Nov 29 '10 at 17:44
    
Good observation. I would assume that to say it over the wound would be a problem of לוחש על המכה. However, to say pasukim to heal someone, even someone not present before you, would still be a problem of עושין דברי תורה רפאות גוף, making words of Torah into "cures for the body". Fundamentally you are reducing the words of Torah which are there to convey ideas, to some verbal formula to heal someone. What do you think? –  RCW Nov 30 '10 at 2:29

I have a Shiur from Rav Asher Weiss Shelit"a and from Rav Meir Eliyahu Shelit"a that discuss this. Here: is the R' Meir Eliyahu Shiur and here is the Rav Asher Weiss.

The discussion really is about saying Tehilim for the sick. Rav Asher Weiss (a Posek) rules that it is Mutar because "Minhag Mevatel Halacha." Rav Meir Eliyahu also discusses the prohibion of Tammim Tihye in regards to going to fake "mekubalim" for them to check your hand (Orhot Sadikim Shaar Yirat Shamayim at least 800 years ago as Rambam quotes him says we lost this practice as brought down in Zohar 1:170), and he also rules that this Asur Mideorayta as brought down in Wayashob Yam 2:12-13.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.