Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Land animals, birds, wheat and fruit offerings all feature on the list of offerings that Bnei Israel bring for Hashem.

Is there anyone that discusses why there are no fish korbanot?

share|improve this question
What about locusts? – Double AA Jun 8 '14 at 16:48
@DoubleAA Indeed! – bondonk Jun 8 '14 at 19:04
Possibly because they are not specifically mentioned as being "allowed" after the flood? Combine that with Rav Kook's A Vision of Vegetarianism and Peace which cites the opinion that the 3rd temple won't have any animal sacrifices. – Avram Levitt Jun 8 '14 at 23:08
Note that it's only domesticated land animals that are brought as offerings (בהמות). Wild animals (חיות), like deer, are not. The birds that are brought are also domesticated species (doves), and wheat is a domesticated grain. It stands to reason that all fish could have been excused on these grounds too, there being no species that might have been considered anything but wild. – Shimon bM Jun 9 '14 at 0:41
@DoubleAA No locusts for a very simple reason: Locusts are considered a curse. The Mishna in Brachot mentions that there is no bracha for something that is a curse with an example of locusts. And would it be proper to offer something that is considered a curse as a sacred offering? – Avram Levitt Jun 9 '14 at 11:04
up vote 13 down vote accepted

The Midrash Tanchuma (Vayikra 1:7) asks your question:

ולמה קריבין קרבן מן העוף ומן הכבשים ומן הצאן ומן העזים ולא מן הדגים, שנאמר, [ו] אם מן העוף עולה קרבנו, אלא בשביל שהם בשר ודם כמו האדם ויוצאין מבטן אמן כמו האדם, מכפרים על האדם. אבל הדגים, ביצים הם ויוצאין מהן וחיין.

And why do we offer up sacrifices from birds, sheep and goats but not from fish?

Because they (animals and birds) resemble man as they are born from the stomach of their mother like man. Thus, they atone for man. Fish, however, are eggs, that they emerge from and live.

I do have a peshat as to what this means (obviously birds come from eggs, too), but I'll have to add this in later..

share|improve this answer
We see birds lay eggs. Fish eggs are generated spontaneously? – Double AA Jun 8 '14 at 22:24
Fish eggs, mice, what isn't? – Avram Levitt Jun 8 '14 at 23:03
how much time do fish eggs spend in the mother fish's belly? – ray Jun 9 '14 at 5:49
Fish generally lay eggs which are then fertilized by the male outside of the mother. Birds generally lay eggs after they are fertilized inside the mother – Baby Seal Jun 9 '14 at 13:01
Is it later yet? – Seth J Jun 10 '14 at 17:04

The Ramban says the reason why their are no chicken Korbanos is because chickens are promiscuous. Seemingly, the same answer would apply to fish who mate frequently. (See also Kli Yakar, Parshas Behaloscha on Basar)

share|improve this answer
please cite source of Ramban – Yoni Jun 8 '14 at 17:24
Chickens are different from fish in that many fish don't mate per se. They reproduce via external fertilisation, its hard to draw comparisons of promiscuity regarding chickens. – bondonk Nov 17 '14 at 23:14

In an extensive article in Dialogue, "Aquatic Perfection: The Fascinating World of Fish and Water," Rabbi Eytan Feiner suggests that fish are from a realm which does not require further perfection [which might also explain why fish do not require shechitah]. He also refers to the (pseudo-) Hiddushei ha-Ran, Shabbat 108a: כשבא נחש על חוה הטיל זוהמא עלי' ועל כל בריות שבעולם, ישראל שעמדו על הר סיני נפסקה זוהמא מהם ומן הבריות שהיו שם חוץ מדגים שלא היו שם.

share|improve this answer
@user9953 maybe you can contact him directly – wfb Dec 9 '15 at 18:03

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.