Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If a person finds a tick on their body or the body of a small child on shabbos may the tick be removed? Is there any problem with trapping, the tick being muktzah, or creating a wound by removing it or does the possibility of contracting a dangerous disease (Lyme poisoning) outweigh other factors?

share|improve this question
2  
Safek pikuach nefesh is mutar on shabbas. –  sam Jun 1 at 2:34
    
Does leaving the tick in longer increase the chances of getting Lyme disease? –  Double AA Jun 1 at 2:36
3  
@DoubleAA yes, the common wisdom says ticks which are removed within 24 hours are generally not able to generate lyme disease in the host, though that has been called into question. But all agree the sooner it is removed the better. lymedisease.org/news/hardscienceonlyme/… –  not-allowed to change my name Jun 1 at 2:45
3  
@DoubleAA Also, if the tick was attached for at least a couple of days (presumably in a case where it went unnoticed throughout that time), it can cause tick paralysis (in about 10 percent of cases). Tick paralysis involves an ascending paralysis that rapidly progresses until it leads to respiratory failure and then death within hours of the onset of symptoms, but removal of the tick will halt the spread of the paralysis and allow a relatively quick recovery. –  Fred Jun 1 at 6:15

2 Answers 2

up vote 10 down vote accepted

If one has a flea on his skin and is biting him, he may remove it, but should not kill it. There is no violation of the melacha of tzad because these items are not generally hunted and are prohibited only Rabbinically, which is waived since there is pain. (Mishne Berurah 316:36,37)

A tick bite in addition to the above heter also involves potential personal danger from Lyme disease and is certainly permitted (even if the tick is not actively biting him) since the danger is viewed as a situation of tzaar (pain) and possibly pikuach nefesh and any Rabbinic prohibitions are certainly waived (Orach Chaim 316:10).

share|improve this answer
    
so this would imply that only if the tick is actively biting may it be removed? –  not-allowed to change my name Jun 1 at 15:52
    
@not-allowedtochangemyname "A tick bite in addition to the above heter also involves potential personal danger from Lyme disease and is certainly permitted, as well." - I updated my answer to directly address your concern –  Yoni Jun 1 at 16:18
    
@not-allowedtochangemyname As opposed to what: passively sucking your blood with its head in your skin? –  Double AA Jun 1 at 16:29
    
@DoubleAA it just passively remaining on the skin. A tick does not necessarily bite right away. I have found them resting on a person with no indication that they ever bit. –  not-allowed to change my name Jun 1 at 16:38
    
@Yoni I'm not sure how the second paragraph follows from the first. If the tick is not biting how is it comparable to the flea which is? –  not-allowed to change my name Jun 1 at 16:39

This summary of the laws comes close to directly answering the question, but it leaves out a direct response to a case of an insect (do not kill or trap, since they pose no true threat but merely hurt) that actually can cause serious harm or even death (whereas an "animal" in such a case, such as a rabid dog should be killed).

The article, quite notably, points out that, if someone were deathly allergic to bee stings, one should endeavor to chase away the bee rather than trap or kill it. I don't believe this advice/Psak is universally followed. I've often seen/heard consideration given to whether a small child is around, for which there is generally given leniency. But, I think, though I'm no Posek, if a Rav were pushed, he'd rule that if the bee really does pose a threat, one can kill it. (The article does note that you can trap an insect that isn't normally hunted, though, as that is only a rabbinic prohibition - as opposed to a large animal that is normally hunted, which is a biblical prohibition.)

I was once in the home of a Rav of mine from high school, and he mentioned that where he lived there were scorpions that were considered to be so dangerous that the Rav there ruled that if a person saw one across the street on Shabbath, he should run across the street and kill it.

I don't know, as I'm not a Posek, but I think there is enough gray area to be concerned about Safek Nefashoth and remove the tick.

One caveat, though, is that if Shabbath is nearly over, it would probably be best to wait.

If you're talking about a child, and the child was playing in a pile of leaves or grass clippings Wednesday and hadn't bathed until just prior to Shabbath so the tick wasn't noticed, and by the time you get the child out of the bath and dried off and dressed it is time to light candles, I'd think it would be prudent to remove the tick, even though you may end up killing the tick in the process after Shabbath has set in.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.