Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In most cases, when peole's names are mentioned in Tana"ch only their and their father's names are mentioned (e.g. - Yehoshu'a bin Nun). In some cases, the grandfather is also mentioned (e.g. - Betzalel ben Uri ben Chur) and in only 1 case I can thnk of (are there others?) the great-grandfather is also mentioned (Korach ben Yitzhar ben K'hat ben Levi). Is there a specific reason why only certain people's names go beyond the father?

share|improve this question

As you mentioned yourself, there are "specific reason[s] why only certain people's names go beyond the father". However, I don't think there is a hard and fast rule for each example, rather each one is brought for a specific reason.

With regards to one of your examples:

Korach's genealogy was listed in the beginning of Numbers 16:1 only up to Levi, since Yaakov (one generation farther) specifically requested that his name not be associated with the quarrel he caused. (Rashi)

I also seem to remember a reason for listing Betzalel's genealogy (possibly due to Chur being killed for trying to prevent the Golden Calf), but I don't remember the source offhand.

share|improve this answer
I don't see how Rashi's piece connects to the question here. – Ypnypn May 27 '14 at 17:56

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.