Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

For much of the past 2000 years, when most of contemporary Halacha was being formulated, there was only a single denomination\sect of Judaism. (Leaving aside Ashkenzi vs Sephardi, which is mostly a matter of minhag.) However, in recent years there has been an explosion of division among Jewry, and now we've got almost a dozen, not even including all the different Hassidic groups. This appears to be a return to the situation at the end of Bayit Sheini, and that situation is reflected in the halakha and hashkafa from that time. (For example, please see http://judaism.stackexchange.com/a/34509/880)

What are the contemporary halakhic and hashkafic implications of this trend?

(Related: What is the orthodox view towards the existence of a progressive denomination?)

share|improve this question
    
Perhaps relevant? judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/34506/… –  Baby Seal Apr 25 at 20:30
    
Can you specify what you mean by halachic and haskafic implications? –  LiquidMetal Jul 21 at 22:58

2 Answers 2

There have been several different sects of Judaism almost since the beginning of the religion.

  • The oldest movements were Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes and Zealots
  • Medieval movements included Karaites and Rabbinical Judaism
  • Rabbinical Judaism split into Chasidic, Orthodox, Reform and Conservative in the US today
  • Other countries have similar movements differently named

source

So there has always been a diversity of opinions and movements in Judaism.

The most recent splits are commonly recognized to be a result of German Jews to assimilate and modernize the parts of Judaism that they viewed as outdated.

source

The complexity of the Jewish people and their practices has long been a part of our history and is in no way a new phenomenon.

share|improve this answer
    
Hey Jeremy, welcome to Mi Yodeya, and thank you for your answer. I hope you don't mind that I edited it the structure and formatting (but not the content); if I did anything you don't like, you can fix it here. –  Shokhet Oct 12 at 0:52

Your question ignores the reality of the twelve shvatim. Each with its own personality, its own sanhedrin, in some instances a definable different pronunciation of words and according to the Arizal different nuschaos hatefila.

Having separate smaller groups is not necessarily a bad thing. I will relate a drasha I heard from one of my rebbeim in beis medrash. While at Har Sinai, the Torah describes the state of the fledgling nation as being at the apex of unity, as one man with one heart. And yet the medrash tells us that when klal yisroel saw the angels parading in separate groups, each with their own flag, Klal Yisroel requested to be separated into tribes and Hashem agreed. What happened? Isn't this disharmony in action? And the answer given was that for each person to feel special and connected to Hashem they need a clearly defined role as part of a smaller microcosm, not to feel like one drop in an endless sea of 600,000, but rather to be part of the smaller group of the tens of thousands. As long as we all recognize each other right to worship Hashem in that person's group and associated style, than diversity can be beautiful. However, as far as interaction between various groups go, most orthodox denominations will not accept a group as being part of Jewish diversity if that group ignores the basic tenets of Judaism, such as adhering to halakha. And the vast majority of orthodox groups do not actively try to convince any other orthodox group that they are soley correct, and that the other needs to change.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.