Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In Yehoshua 7:15 God tells Yehoshua that when he finds the man that took from the forbidden booty of Jericho he should punish him with burning. Yet at the end of that very chapter in verse 25 Achan is punished by stoning, not burning. Why is that?

share|improve this question
related judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/36478/… – Y ez Apr 24 '14 at 20:15
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Rashi comments on verse 15 that God’s instruction that he “he shall be burnt with fire” refers to Achan’s tent and movable property. In verse 25 he explains that “all Yisrael stoned him with stones” because he had violated the Shabbos (the looting of Jericho took place on the Shabbos). Rashi seems to understand that God’s instruction to burn did not refer Achan.

But the Ralbag writes that both punishments were meted out to Achan - stoning for violating the Shabbos, and burning for violating the ban on looting. He also brings another explanation in the name of his father, that they burned Achan as per God’s instruction, but they also threw stones at him on the way to be burnt because they were very angry at him.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.