Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Hashem did not want to mete out any punishments at the giving of the Torah in order to not ruin the joy of the moment (Rashi to Shemos 24:11). But Hashem was fine with seemingly ruining the joy of the inauguration of the Mishkan with the deaths of Nadav and Avihu (Vayikra 10:1-2).

Why the discrepancy?

share|improve this question
Targum Jonathan may address this. It essentially says that the entire nation will see such a death and Gd will be glorified. Har Sinai was a unique occurence and the foundation of the very core of the Jewish People. Service in the tabernacle was the opposite, a perpetual duty that could lend itself to abuse, intrigue, and laxness. It needed to be made clear from the get go that there were clear boundaries, and that those boundaries were not to be trifled with. No timefor actual source, so I'm leaving as comment. Someone is welcom toconvert to answer. Its the verse in which Moses comforts Aaron – Baby Seal Mar 24 '14 at 2:33
@BabySeal I had a thought along those lines - Yom Chasunaso vs. Yom Simchas Libo. But I'm hoping to get something more developed as an answer. – Y ez Mar 24 '14 at 2:35

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.