Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Here is the source that you should make noise at the mention of Haman's name.

However, as I was listening to the Megillah this year it occurred to me how counterproductive it is as an act of erasing Amalek, as this ends up requiring the reader to repeat Haman's name so that everyone will hear it. So it amounts to increasing the mention of Amalek.

Are there any sources that say specifically not to make noise for Haman's name, for this reason?

share|improve this question
    
Yes Rav Henkin held if it is disruptive it would not be done –  sam Mar 18 at 19:15
    
@sam Thank you. I finished with the words "for this reason" to rule out that reason. –  YEZ Mar 18 at 19:16
1  
The idea of wiping out the name of amelek also has to do with the remembrance of amelek,you can't have one without the other one,it is not a stirah to hear hamans name again because it is another opportunity to remember what amelek did. –  sam Mar 18 at 19:39
    
@sam well you aren't doing very much wiping out of the latter mention. I don't think we go around putting up Amalek reminders and not destroying them so there will be more Amalek remembrance. –  YEZ Mar 18 at 19:45
1  
I am just addressing you statement of being counterproductive,we bang to wipe out the name but there is a technical problem of hearing every letter so they repeat the word in order to fulfill the mitzvah,I don't see an issue with it. –  sam Mar 18 at 19:51

2 Answers 2

According to the Ezras Torah Luach, 5774 Edition, pp. 101-102:

Rav Henkin noted that the Reading of the Megillah, both at night as well as in the morning, is an obligation incumbent upon every man and woman. Therefore, the reader must have a powerful voice that can be heard by everyone. He must read very precisely, without swallowing any words or even letters. For if anyone misses hearing even one word, he does not fulfill his obligation. Because of the noise that is made after the mention of Haman, many people do not hear the words, and thus fail to perform a Biblical ( מדברי קבלה ) commandment. Those who initiated this custom of making noise at the mention of Haman's name, had the pure intentions of performing the Mitzvah in a superior fashion. But, today the interest is only in wanton levity and unruly conduct that is always prohibited. The Sefardim have a custom of making noise only at the mention of Haman during the singing of Shoshanas Yaakov, after the Reading of the Megillah is already over. This is a fitting custom that should be universally adopted. However, during the reading of the Megillah, we should tolerate no noise-making.

share|improve this answer
1  
I'm not sure this answers the question, which sought, very specifically, a source for not banging because doing so would cause the reader to repeat the name and that'd be increasing the mention of Amalek, precisely the opposite of what is intended by the banging. –  msh210 Mar 19 at 0:53
    
Fair enough. [15] –  Seth J Mar 19 at 1:03

The Chabad custom is to stomp feet instead of making noise with one's voice and/or noisemakers. In my experience, this makes it easier to hear the recitation. I'm not sure if that is the reason for the custom, or where the custom originates.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.