Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

May a woman (or a man) wear immodest clothing over an artificial part of her body?

(Lets assume that beged ish is not a consideration)

i.e. if she has artifical legs, may she wear short shorts?

Possible considerations include whether it's considered wearing.

share|improve this question
Do the artificial body parts look like forbidden things? Pictures or pixels resembling naked people aren't good even though they aren't naked people. – Double AA Mar 4 '14 at 4:51
I don't understand your last sentence. Of what relevance to the rest of your post is whether it's considered "wearing"? Or is that a completely separate question? – msh210 Mar 4 '14 at 5:38
I assume the man wouldn't have to consider beged ish issues. – Double AA Mar 4 '14 at 5:40
If your question is "is it considered wearing" then why not include beged ish ? if you are asking about modesty then you should edit your question to reflect that. – eramm Mar 4 '14 at 11:27


If wearing a short skirt will cause others to feel embarrassed or uncomfortable, to see a pair of metal legs, then it would seemingly be forbidden to intentionally put those people in that situation.

If the communal standard in that place is that women wear a certain length of skirt, then wearing a short one would violate "al tifrosh" (Pirkei Avot, 2:5) even if it didn't violate tznius.

share|improve this answer
Your statements may make good sense (though arguably the communal standard is to cover parts of the body and not to wear a length of skirt -- after all, who measure in inches? People measure to a body part, which is irrelevant here -- but whatever), but the links you included seem AFAICT to have nothing at all to do with what you wrote. – msh210 Mar 4 '14 at 14:15
@msh210 Thank you. The first link is a full treatment of the concept of embarrassment in halacha. If a woman in an observant community chooses to show off her metal legs (instead of wearing a normal length skirt that covers them), it can make others feel embarrassed / uncomfortable, which is itself a prohibition. I removed the second link, and simply added the citation in Pirkei Avot, which was my original intention. Many Beis Yaakov schools measure skirts in inches. In a "BY" type community, it would be "al tifrosh". – Oholiav Mar 4 '14 at 14:23
1. So if my face is disfigured, I must not go out in public so other people don't have the tzar of having to look at me? However 2. If the skirt length is mandated not due to tznius but due to custom, then I could understand why al tifrosh would be a consideration. – Clint Eastwood Mar 4 '14 at 15:03
Lets say this woman was a regular wearer of short shorts and then lost her legs in an accident. The shorts are not a new phenomena meant to show off the metal legs. – Clint Eastwood Mar 4 '14 at 15:12
AFAIK girls' schools that measure in inches measure in "inches below the knee", which is irrelevant here (as there's no knee). But I may well be wrong. – msh210 Mar 4 '14 at 15:36

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.