One of the difficult tests Avraham Avinu faced was when Nimrod threw him into the (Kivshan Haish) fire. It is not mentioned in the Torah at all. Why?
|
Though Rashi (Avot 5:3) lists the Kivshan Haish among Avraham Avinu's 10 trials, the Rambam counts only the trials listed in the Torah among the 10 trials that Avraham faced. So in his view, Kivshan Haish was not 10 of Avraham's 10 trials. |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
We don't learn to our own lives things from the Ur Kasdim miracle. Since there Avraham started disputing (he broke the idols of his father), but for the halocha until somebody interfering our lives we don't have to proof to all that we are right. Avraham made so because it was his way to spread the monotheism in the world. It is described in the Book of Daniel about the miracle of Hannan'ya Mishael and Azar'ya in many details, because that story learn us how to behave in situation when somebody do interfering our lives. Same answer for many miracles that are not mentioned by Torah, like this one. |
|||||
|
|
I think there are two important points to be made in considering this question. 1) Many of the insights provided to us by the midrashim regarding Avraham's "youth" (i.e. up to 70 years old, when we are told the first narrative information about his life other than birth, marriage and relatives dying) bridge the gap between the world of sin/non-recognition of God that we've known about since [Enosh or] No'ach and the rapid development of monotheism. This development, which was catalyzed by many possible epiphanic events in those 70 years, is not central to the Torah's primary message of carrying out service of God once He has presented us with requirements, or to Sefer B'reshis's primary purpose of establishing the Divine process of determining and delivering [contingent] stewardship of the Land by B'nei Yisra'el (for lack of a better term). The Torah almost never spends time on "character development" - expect it as one might from a literary narrative. 2) Given that, the Midrash points out several allusions to the furnace incident in the Torah and other s'farim, including the very name of Avraham's hometown, אוּר (!=אוֹר) כשדים. |
|||||||||
|
|
Perhaps to suggest a different approach. Perhaps the reason it is not mentioned in the Torah is because it didn't actually happen. It is a Medrash that demands explanation, but we are not bound to take it literally (see other responses on taking Medrashim litarally). Perhaps the interpretation can better be understood by understanding what Avraham did. Avrham grew up in a society of Pagan Idolaters. He through careful analysis and thought came to the conclusion that this belief system is wrong. He showed clear proofs and arguments as to the fallacy of worshiping idols. He was against the prevalent religious view of the times. He began to share his views with people. He began to have a following of people (Rambam reports thousands). This put him in a very dangerous position. Nimrod himself according to the commentary (see seforno, Bereshit 10,10 on Tower of Babel) used the peoples religious beliefs to gain power over the people. Avraham was a threat to his plans to gain power. Perhaps the Medrash is suggesting that it was due to Hashem's assistance that Avraham was able to navigate the political terrain and survive. Exactly what the situation was, I don't know, but it was a dangerous political situation and one wrong move could have been the end of Avraham. We have seen many philosophers confronted with similar situations in history. So, it doesn't mean literally a oven of fire, but that Hashem assisted Avraham from the political fires that threatened Avraham's life. (See Rambam Hilchot Avodat Chochavim Chapter 1, Law 1) |
|||||||||||
|