Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is a man permitted to watch tv or movies that feature immodestly dressed women? Assuming one will not have improper thoughts, is it prohibited to look at an immodestly dressed woman on a screen? Are images on a screen included in the prohibition of ervah? Is there any limmud zechus for the common practice of watching tv or movies?

share|improve this question
    
Something to think about. Historically, Jewish books have contained many nude images. blog.chron.com/iconia/2012/06/… –  avi Jan 30 at 7:07
    
Your question asks even if they don't have bad thoughts,that I personally believe is an impossibility when it comes to the programs of today. –  sam Jan 30 at 13:59
    
Yes, it was acceptable in Jewish books. seforim.blogspot.com/2013/03/… –  Ish Ploni ViKohen Jan 30 at 18:36

1 Answer 1

up vote 7 down vote accepted

Chacham Ovadia in Yechavei Daas 4:7 writes that seeing a woman on tv is the same as seeing an actual woman when it comes to hirur(thoughts) and there is an issur of lo tassuru achrei levavchem...however when it comes to reading shema that's a discussion which he talks about whether its mutar or not,but an issur of seeing a picture of a woman who is not dressed properly is assur,he brings many sources.

The Rivevos Ephraim 6:pg 576 also discusses this issue of seeing a womans hair on tv,but also mentions the issur of tv.

Rabbi Nebontzol in his Kuntres Hanhagos writes tv is assur,and if one is in a room with someone who has inappropriate pictures he can take them down without permission.

share|improve this answer
1  
What is the issur of tv that the latter two sources mention? The first source at least explains what he is talking about. –  Double AA Jan 30 at 15:21
    
Same idea ,they write many issurim are involved –  sam Jan 30 at 15:35
    
Same idea as what? The first source correctly does not make up an "issur tv". –  Double AA Jan 30 at 15:37
    
They write that many issurim are involved,they are probably referring to the same issur of lo sassuru... And I have seen other commentaries say other issurim,Chacham Ovadia is main source but Rivevos and Rav Nebantzol also add to the same idea even though it is not an actual woman it is assur because of hirhur(not written explicitly,but obvious) –  sam Jan 30 at 15:44
    
How does lo sasuru imply an "issur tv"? Why can't you just say what they actually say instead of being vague and adding interpretation without saying so? –  Double AA Jan 30 at 17:55

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.