Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I want to define free-will for this question as a moral right and wrong decision, not an arbitrary decision or a true/false decision. I am familiar with sources that say that angels do not have free will of this type. I have also often heard quoted an idea that "angels have free will, but it is just so clear to them that they should make the right decision that they almost never make the wrong decision." Can anyone provide sources predating the 20th century (the earlier the better) which support this idea?

share|improve this question
    
    
    
I actually saw both of those and phrased my question the way I did because neither of those answer my question. The Rambam about moving is not a moral decision. Rav Moshe and R' Shafier are not pre-20th century sources. The Gemaras brought in the other thread are not compelling (as the opposing view of course understands them differently). –  YEZ Jan 19 at 7:07
    
YEZ, while the answers at judaism.stackexchange.com/q/27977 may not satisfy you, it seems to be a duplicate of your question. Am I missing something? If the only problem there is that the answers don't suffice (but the question matches yours), then see mi.yodeya.com/help/no-one-answers. –  msh210 Jan 19 at 7:59
    
if the they live in an arena where ""angels have free will, but it is just so clear to them that they should make the right decision that they never make the wrong decision." than I don't know why that is called free will –  eramm Jan 19 at 13:20

2 Answers 2

this issue is clearly addressed by rebbi yonoson eibeshitz yaros devash vol 1 drush 2

share|improve this answer
7  

There's a responsa quoted in Otzar Hageonim (vol. 1 pg. 6) about praying to angels, where he quotes several Gemaras and Midrashim that angels have free will. Several commentators, among them Rashi (19:22), discuss this in the story of Sedom where Chazal indicate that the angels may have sinned at various points. Ohr Hachayim there (19:20) takes this a step further and actually says that it was in the hands of the angels to decide who to kill and destroy, once they were given permission to descend (a very literal interpretation of כיון שנתנה רשות למשחית).

Radak to Beraishis 19:21 states (I'll quote it since it isn't online as far as I know):

נראה מזה כי כשהקב"ה שולח מלאך נותן להם רשות להוסיף או לגרוע מעט משליחותם כפי אשר יראו ויבינו כי בעלי שכל הם - When God sends an angel he gives them permission to add or subtract slightly as they see fit because they are intelligent beings

Rabbeinu Bachya also writes that though angels don't have free will, they can still make mistakes. See his comments to Beraishis 3:6 (שאע"פ שאין בהם יצה"ר הרי הם נוטים לפעמים מן הדרך הראוי) as well as 19:13. As @YEZ pointed out, though, these commentators (Radak, Rabbeinu Bachya, and Ohr Hachayim) probably understand that these angels were mistaken in their judgement, but because they misjudged the situation, not because they have a will to violate God's command or act immorally (as explained by the Ramchal, in Daas Tevunos 2:31).

Returning to the original question, then, we have the letter from the Geonim which strongly implies (I believe) that angels have actual moral free will. I thought the Rambam also believed that angels could theoretically have free will, as he seems to state in Moreh Nevuchim (2:7): "they have will and choice... though they will always choose the good". I should point out though that in his introduction to Cheilek, in the fifth foundation, he states unequivocally that angels are not free agents

R. Yonasan Eibshutz also states (Yaaros Devash 1:2, second column here) that the Torah was given to man who has free will as opposed to angels, but if the angels were on earth, they too would have free will (and do evil). This very idea is actually found much earlier, in Yalkut Shimoni Beraishis 6:44. Both of these ideas sound like the opinion referenced in the question, 'they can choose to do evil but do not because the truth is clear to them'. Such an idea is popular, I think, among contemporary thinkers (such as R. Moshe Feinstein in Derash Moshe, Shemos 1:1)

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the sources. However, most of them can be explained in line with the Rabbeinu Bachya - see Da'as Tevunos Chelek 2 siman 31 (somewhere around there) if you want to see the explanation of this position. They are not necessarily talking about moral right-wrong decisions. Yaaros Devash is telling, but more seems to imply the opposite - angels as they are do not have free will. –  YEZ Mar 23 at 2:09
    
I'm sorry but I'm not sure what position of the Daas Tevunos you're referring to, can you provide a link please? I thought that you were looking for sources indicating that angels have the intellectual capacity for moral decision making, even if that ability wouldn't be put into practice. I may have misunderstood you're use of 'moral' –  Matt Mar 23 at 4:05
1  
That is what I'm looking for, but the ability to make decisions does not equal the ability to make moral decisions - e.g. in the Radak, how to translate their mission and decide who to kill is not a moral decision. The angels "sinning" is interpreted by that school of thought to be making a judgement mistake, not having decided to willingly disobey Hashem. –  YEZ Mar 23 at 17:37
    
The Teshuvos Geonim is the same as the others - talking about having רשות does not constitute moral authority. I don't think R' Eibshutz is a proof- if they were on Earth, they would then have a physical component, and then they would be different than they are now - perhaps the coming to Earth would be the cause of their free will. In fact, his language implies to the contrary - "if only you were בעלי בחירה" sounds like you aren't, but if you were... So we are left with the Rambam, who contradicts himself. (Incidentally, you uncovered my hidden agenda - to find a source for R' Moshe) –  YEZ Jun 9 at 3:04
    
@YEZ hm, that's not how I understood R. Eibschutz, but now that I read more of it I see your point. IIRC the idea is also in an Ohr Sameach in Hilchos Yesodei HaTorah –  Matt Jun 9 at 3:28

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.