Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In this question we learnt that if the Chazzan left out a brocho in his repetition of the amida he would have to repeat the repetition.

Is it right to point out that the Chazzan omitted a brocho?

If he is told, he is very likely to be embarrassed and embarrassing someone is a Torah prohibition, {page 20 column 2} whereas the fixed form of our prayers is rabbinic .

So I might think that it is best not to notice the omission.

share|improve this question
    
We correct Baalei Keriya when they make mistakes which are problematic. –  Double AA Dec 31 '13 at 20:56
    
The linked question states that the halachah mandates that he repeat the amida. Everyone makes mistakes in life. So as long as the mistake is pointed out in a respectful manner then I don't know why that would be what the Torah considers embarrassment. –  eramm Jan 1 at 16:30
    
@eramm The question was based on an actual occurrence. I judged by the redness of his face at the time he was told! –  Avrohom Yitzchok Jan 1 at 16:35
    
Since the halacha mandates it as long as it's done in a sensitive manner (key word = sensitive) then it needs to be done regardless if the origin is rabbinic. it's halacha now. see this discussion theyeshivaworld.com/news/headlines-breaking-stories/207549/… –  eramm Jan 1 at 17:20
add comment

1 Answer

Yes. See Shulchan Aruch Orach Chaim 126:1 - "mazkirim oso" ("we remind him"). In fact, if the shatz skips over Birchas HaMalshinim, the Michaber goes as far to say "misalkin oso" ("we remove him") due to concerns of apikorsus. The Mishneh Brurah expands that concern to other brochas.

Additionally, a shatz can be replaced with another shatz if he is unable to restart from the point at which he messed up (126:2).

It would seem that kavod hatzibbur and communal needs outweigh individual embarrassment in this case.

share|improve this answer
    
Note that When Shulchan Aruch stated "mazkirim osi" it was referring to mid-repetition, whereas this question is about if the mistake was noticed after the repetition had already been completed.. (I am not disagreeing with the conclusion; just pointing out that it's not the exact case). –  Michoel Jan 1 at 9:10
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.