Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

There is a group that teaches that analyzing the words in Genesis 1:26 :

  1. And God said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness, and they shall rule over the fish of the sea and over the fowl of the heaven and over the animals and over all the earth and over all the creeping things that creep upon the earth."

  2. And God created man in His image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

The reason why two images came out, one male and one female, is because G-d has two images, a male and a female image, and that Elohim represents that. Here is a video where they explain it better :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdGiwk5ohNQ . How true is that? Is it possible for Elohim to mean that G-d has two images, a male and a female image? Thanks!

share|improve this question
The group that teaches this is actually a doomsday cult. And they are very effective with this teaching (for them G-d the mother is a korean lady) but I'm trying to see how to prove that their teaching is not that correct. The problem is that they have a comeback for everything. – User Dec 16 '13 at 20:46

It is important to keep in mind that the effectively universal opinion1 in Orthodox Judaism is that Gd takes no image. So when Gd is described as anthropomorphic in any Jewish literature, in order to understand that description, we must think in an abstract, metaphorical way.

This view is codified explicitly in Maimonides' 13 Principles of faith, which he outlines in his commentary on the mishnah ,(Sanh. 10:1). It is based on verses in the Bible, Deuteronomy 4:15, to name one. This stance is also evident from Tanaaic times, through Onkelos the Convert's translation of the bible into aramaic, where he goes out of his way to describe human-like attributes of Gd in conceptual ways, (one of many, many examples can be seen in Genesis 29:32).

Equally important is the concept of the oneness of Gd, discussed by Maimonides in the same place, and based on Deuteronomy 6:4. Maimonides puts it best:

"... not like one in a pair and not like one in a species and not like a single man that splits in to many individuals and not like one simple body that can be split up endlessly, rather He... is one in oneness, that there is none like it in oneness..."

So Gd having two literal images, or being of two genders, or having gender at all, or being two things contradicts fundamental Jewish belief.

All of that being said, we do see both genders applied to Gd. Generally, Gd is referred to as a male, whether He is referred to with the name Elokim, (Gen. 1:27), the ineffable name, (Gen 2:5), or the name of Adonut, (Gen. 18:30).

The only female word we find attributed to Gd is the title Shechina, the dwelling or resting [of G-d's presence]. This name is alluded to in Ex. 25:8, and mentioned explicitly many times throughout rabbinic literature, for example by Onkelos in Gen 9:27, in Megillah 29a, or Bava Basra 58b. The Shechina is even referred to metaphorically as a niddah, a woman who is impure from her menses, in the extremely esoteric passage of קם רבי שמעון Which is from the Tikkunei Zohar, (see Artscroll Yom Kippur Machzor Hayim Yehezkel p. 56).

One way of understanding Gd's being described as male and female is through the roles of men and women, seen most clearly and simply through the act of procreation. The male acts upon the female, who receives that action and nurtures it, creating new life.

Based on the above metaphor, one can easily see Gd's role as a male, for everything comes from Him, and He controls the world and acts upon it.

I have come across two understandings of Gd's female role. The first is alluded to in Exodus 25:8, "And they shall make for Me a holy place, and I shall dwell amongst them". Notice that Gd dwells amongst us only after we make a holy place for Him. In order to have a realization and appreciation of Gd's presence in our lives and from our perspective we must preform an action which He responds to, cultivating it into a human realization of His Presence, as the female cultivates the actions of the male.

The second understanding is based on the final 'Heh' in the ineffable four letter Name, (I think I saw this in Jewish Meditation, written by Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan, z"l). Basically, the letters of the name describe Gd's conveying effects of His will from Himself unto us. The final Heh, the Shechinah represents His receiving His presence unto us, allowing us to be aware of and recognize Him. In accepting His presence from Himself unto us, He is playing the role of the female in the metaphor, (Bear in mind the Oneness Principle).

1. I asked Rav Ahron Lopiansky about Corporealist Rishonim. He said that there are only two that we know of who even mention it as a possibility. One is the Ravad, who mentions corporealism as a mistake that some made. The other is Rav Moshe Taku, who discusses corporealism, but whose extant work is too fragmented to surmise any clear opinion or stance from. First and foremost it is a polemic against rationalism, esotericism, and any other processes of analysis that he felt "watered down" the simple meaning of the Bible and the Sages. Any mention of corporealism would then just be an argumentative counter claim to show the holes in such claims.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.