Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Asexuality is a sexual orientation characterized by the lack of sexual attraction towards people in general. Asexuals may or may not be interested in romantic relationships, but are not physically drawn towards sexual activity. They may choose to live celibately, or to participate in sexual activity for practical considerations, so asexuality and celibacy are two very different things.

Is an asexual person obligated in the mitzvah of Pru Urvu despite not experiencing sexual attraction at all? On the one hand mitzvot are normally obligatory even when one does not want to perform them. On the other hand, perhaps the psychological damage that would be incurred by forcing this person to have children would exempt them. Furthermore, perhaps the commandment is contingent on the presence of sexual attraction in the first place, as suggested by an anonymous source here (the key claim is that "If a person’s psychological infrastructure was such that it didn’t attract him to women, he is not obliged to steel himself and live in a marital relationship in order to have children.").

share|improve this question
2  
Good enough to get my +1 now. Still, do you have any basis to suspect "perhaps the commandment is contingent on the presence of sexual attraction in the first place"? –  Isaac Moses Dec 16 '13 at 19:59
1  
Good question. Still, +0: we need more information about the person you're asking about. 1. Are they married or single? 2. Does their lack of sexual desire cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty? (If so, it may not be simple "asexuality": it may actually be hypoactive sexual desire disorder or another diagnosable sexual disorder. Possible treatments may include couples therapy, sensate focus therapy, medication, and/or others. Here where I live, health insurance covers all sorts of sexual matters.) 3. Are they reluctant to consult a doctor and to consult a rabbi? 4. If so, why? –  tealhill Dec 17 '13 at 7:07
1  
@tealhill I'm not asking about a particular person; this is a hypothetical question. And the question is asking about asexuality, as is explicitly stated, not about hypoactive sexual desire disorder or anything of that sort. –  Malper Dec 17 '13 at 9:24
6  
There was some discussion on MSO about questions asked out of curiosity, with positive results. We've had other questions that aren't about a problem directly faced by the asker (like, say, about keeping Shabbat in space). This kind of inquisitiveness is, dare I say, a hallmark of Jewish study and I don't think that alone is reason to reject a question. As for the issues of individual variation (is this person married vs. single, etc), a good answer would address all the parameters that matter. –  Monica Cellio Dec 17 '13 at 22:36
2  
@tealhill, if we understand that to be the standard, then combine that with all questions should not be seeking practical guidance because CYLOR, you can't ask anything on this site. Questions phrased as real actual problems get modified, downvoted and/or closed on this site. So what is left? –  Yishai Dec 17 '13 at 23:06

3 Answers 3

Obviously, such a person should have a discussion with a mental health professional just to make sure they understand what's going on and how to cope with everything in their life. Similarly, when seriously dating s/he should make clear to a prospective spouse what to expect in this relationship. People can work out all sorts of things. (Maybe he can find a similarly asexual woman and their marriage isn't about physical attraction.)

The rule of thumb is that a person is exempt from a "yes-do" mitzva if it would cost him/her 25% of his/her assets. (E.g. is no woman in the world will marry me unless I pay $100k, and my total net worth is $200k, I'm not expected to get married.) There may be people out there for whom no fulfilling marriage can be found whatsoever, and the psychological toll of an unfulfilling marriage would be equivalent to losing 25% of one's assets, which would prompt this question. I can't make a blanket rule for every individual. It's all a question of how to apply that concept here.

I do think that if such a person spends some time contemplating what they seek in a relationship, finds an appropriate partner, and is open about their expectations, that they could likely make a marriage work without taking a huge toll on themselves (it may even be beneficial) -- that's my guesstimate for most cases.

share|improve this answer
2  
If the ongoing cost of marriage and kids counts towards the 25% (as opposed to the immediate cost of the wedding, say) then no one other than the most extremely wealthy is obligated to get married. –  Yishai Dec 16 '13 at 23:55
    
@Yishai Presumably the marital satisfaction that most people get balances it out. –  Malper Dec 17 '13 at 3:01
1  
@Malper, I'm not aware of an exception to that rule based on if you like the Mitzvah. People may choose to do it anyway, but that doesn't create an obligation. –  Yishai Dec 17 '13 at 13:42
    
1)I'm pretty sure that it is 1/5th i.e. 20% and 2)My teacher, a Rav, cited this general rule specifically with respect the the mitzvah to procreate so if it is worthwhile to discuss it's relevance with your Rav if need be. –  Yirmeyahu Dec 17 '13 at 16:39

Are w talking about married asexuals, or unmarried? Lemaise, we haven't been concerned about making unmarried people fulfill prvi irvi since, when, centuries at least? The Remu says that we don't.

Married aces, OK. (And yes, there are plenty of them, some of them married to other aces, and some married to sexuals.) If the woman is ace, it should be entirely irrelevant to the halakhic question, because she's anyway not obligated in pri irvi, no?

So the real question is whether an asexual man is obligated in pri irvi, and hey, he's not the one who actually has to physically get pregnant.

So what's the issue, 15 minutes of sex, one or two times, that he might find anything between enjoyable to boring to repulsive (as is the case for plenty of sexuals, of course, in any given act of sex)? Nu? And today there's artificial insemination.

In other words, I think that the questioner doesn't really understand what asexuality is, and is still living with pre-1961 notions that sex and procreation are the same thing.

share|improve this answer
  1. I would have thought that every Jewish adult is required to keep the mitzvah of pru urevu. No exeptions made!
  2. No-one has the right to inflict harm physical, emotional, or spiritual to anyone else just for the sake of needing to fulfill a requirement.
  3. Any g-d fearing person - with the right guidance - can enjoy the fact that he is engaging in a great mitzvah, no less then putting on tefilin which must be done with great simcha [Devorim 28 47]. Many Tzadikim would do what ever they could in order not to have physical benefit from thier physical relationships [see Rashi Bereishis 12 11, Shulchon Oruch OC 240 8], yet they still basked in the enjoyment of engaging in many the great mitzvos they are doing, Vesimach, Onah, Pru Urevu, Sheves.
  4. on a practical note, he should check that he is physically able to...
  5. obviously as previously mentioned, a visit to a doctor or mental health adviser, would be a good idea.
  6. whats the guys name and mothers name so we can daven for him!
share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.