Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

There was a pot of soup that a fly fell into it. The fly was not located and therefore the whole soup became prohibited. Even though the soup might have 60 parts against the fly, still since the fly is an entity in and of itself it is not nullified in the soup even if there would be a 1000 parts against it.

The soup by mistake was then divided entirely into 3 separate bowls. Could we then say in such a situation that the soup is now permitted to eat since if looking at these three separate bowls we could say that the fly is in one of the bowls, however that it becomes nullified in the other bowls (the majority - 1 in 2 - bittul b'rov)

My doubt in this is since the pot of soup became prohibited to begin with it would therefore remain prohibited even when divided out into 3 bowls. Or perhaps now it would become nullified.

What is the din and what is proof for this?

share|improve this question
If the fly is intact, you should be able to identify it. – Fred Nov 17 '13 at 23:25
@Fred Assuming of course the person wasn't able to identify it as noted in the question – Yehoshua Nov 17 '13 at 23:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.