Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If I understand correctly, scientists such as Natan Aviezer and Gerald Schroeder have readings of Genesis Chapter 1 that fit with the current scientific understanding of how the universe/planet/life developed.

How do they read the fourth day? ("Sun, moon, and stars" come after "dry land and vegetation", but before aquatic life?)

share|improve this question
1  
Surprised this question got a downvote. You can't make everyone happy all the time, I guess ... –  Shalom Oct 5 '10 at 15:45
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 7 down vote accepted

Aviezer doesn't concern himself with creation except where the shoresh "bara" appears. The rest are the "big events" that brought the earth to its current state. So acc. to Aviezer-

Day 3= The Permian Ice Age where the waters of the flooded earth glaciated in the South Pole causing the oceans to recede. Later during this period was the proliferation of modern plant life.

Day 4= The point at which the Earth's eccentricity, axial obliquity and season of perihelion (in relation to the sun) aligned to allow a 24 hour day, 365+ day year and today's seasons (about 10,000 years before present, which is what also ended the most recent ice age). These changes are caused by the moons gravitational "pull".

share|improve this answer
3  
Fascinating. "Let there be illuminators fixed in the sky such that they separate between day and night, demarcating set times, days, and years." Didn't happen until they were fixed as they currently are. –  Shalom Dec 6 '10 at 13:22
    
How does he explain day 5 being after day 4? Though that's a really nice explanation, and fits the pshat rather nicely. And a much better reading than the one I'm about to post. –  avi Jan 19 '12 at 16:45
    
@avi, I think the point is that since "day" is not a day, but an event, the chronology is not important. Why that order? I don't know! –  YDK Jan 23 '12 at 21:29
add comment

I'm not certain if the source is Gerald Schroeder or just someone similar to him, but I read many years ago the idea that day 4 corresponds to the clouds of carbon and other early elements parting, and allowing actual visible light to be seen from earth. I believe this corresponds to the time right before "sea soup" allowed for larger multicellular organism in the ocean.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Moon wouldn't be a problem, one of the major cosmological theory contenders for the creation of the Moon is that the Moon is coalesced debris from Earth.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.