Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question asks why the flood didn't end on the 18th of Cheshvan (one year after the start). My question is more basic: why does the torah give us precise dates here at all? Bereishit 7:11 tells us it began on 17 Cheshvan and Bereishit 8:14 tells us it ended on 27 Cheshvan a year later -- but I don't think we get another precise date before the exodus begins.

Why is it important to tell us the flood began and ended on these exact dates?

share|improve this question
    
To tell us it was a complete solar year? –  Menachem Oct 31 '13 at 5:07
    
@Menachem Just say ויהי אחרי שנה תמימה or so. Also, who cares that it was a complete solar year? –  Double AA Oct 31 '13 at 6:50
    
similar judaism.stackexchange.com/q/17810/759 –  Double AA Oct 31 '13 at 6:50
    
@Menachem, we get durations without dates all over the place; we know how old people were, that Avraham circumcised Yitzchak on the 8th day, how long the famine in Mitzrayim was... the text is clearly able to tell us about durations without giving us exact dates. So why the exact dates here? –  Monica Cellio Oct 31 '13 at 12:38
    
I like this question even though I get the sense that there is a question of literary veracity - the more detail, the more acceptable as an accurate story. There is also a parallel to all the later events based in precise dates (holidays, kingships, wars). –  Danno Oct 31 '13 at 17:46

1 Answer 1

A book written by a human claiming to be divine will not include dates (or any specific details) lest someone spot an error in them and then claim that it is not divine. The Torah being divine is not afraid to include specific details; thus this proves that the Torah is a Divine Document.

share|improve this answer
4  
Welcome to Mi Yodeya, Duvid, and thanks for the interesting answer. editing in a source for it could make it much more valuable. –  Scimonster Oct 20 at 15:16
3  
This is only true if those humans expect there target audience to become sophisticated enough before those humans die to spot the error. 3000 years ago most people were probably illiterate and didn't have records to check anyway. Hence this is a weak proof which only sounds good to our modern critical-thinking minds. –  Double AA Oct 20 at 15:17
    
@DoubleAA Why does it have to be those humans? Wouldn't humans 5 bajillion years later also be part of the consideration? Why were "those humans" alive then their only target audience? Unless they only wanted to make up a religion for a short while. (Still means they had to have the expectation that humans would eventually become sophisticated enough.) –  YEZ Oct 20 at 15:34
    
@YEZ Sure. If I was making up a cult for my benefit, why would I can what happens to it in 500 years? I'll be long gone. –  Double AA Oct 20 at 15:35
    
@DoubleAA since no one has ever cared what people think about them once they are gone. Like Napoleon or Stalin who wanted to make absolutely sure that there would be statues of them after they were dead. –  YEZ Oct 20 at 15:39

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.