Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The Gemara in Shekalim 3a seeks to prove the concept of Hefker Beith Din Hefker. To that end, it cites the incident in which Ezra decreed that anyone who refused to gather in Jerusalem would forfeit his assets. But this seems to me to just show that he employed a coercive tactic, not that he was right to do so, nor that this tactic was appropriate or legitimate. How does Ezra's decree prove Hefker Beith Din Hefker?

share|improve this question
It seems that we learn from actions recorded in Torah, even if the person doing so isn't a good guy (like not marrying an older sister before a younger is derived from Lavan). Kal VaChomer here. – Shmuel Brin Oct 25 '13 at 21:06
@Shmuel That's certainly true, and I realized that when I learned this. Still, when it asked the question, I was ready for some heavy-hitting analysis, and I was left wondering, "is that really it?" I mean, it's a pretty powerful concept, and if it's just because 'Ezra did it, I'm surprised. I mean, under what authority was he acting? How did he know he wasn't just stealing? On the flip side, was it even enforced, or was it just a threat? Can we learn from threats? – Seth J Oct 25 '13 at 21:44
You might want to add in the last two sentences of your comment (or their content, rephrased) into your question. – msh210 Oct 27 '13 at 1:37
@msh210, I think the penultimate sentience might be a separate question, although an answer to it would be useful background information for an answer to this question.. – Seth J Oct 27 '13 at 2:11
Plus, we'd expect the Torah (or at least the Oral Torah) to criticize him for illegally taking away people's things. – Shmuel Brin Oct 27 '13 at 19:57

Ezra was comparable to Moshe, and would have given the Torah had Moshe not preceded him, so it is not unreasonable to say that his actions were legitimate.

Anyway, it is also seen from a posuk in Yehoshua, in Yevomos 89b.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.