Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I recently received a new gadget: The Jawbone UP band. Look it up on Google, but the basic idea is it is a bracelet you wear 24/7 that measures all kind of things while you move around.

Should it be removed on Shabbat?

share|improve this question
It would be better if you could edit the question to briefly describe this gadget. We prefer that questions be self-contained, without requiring readers to resort to Google (and anyway, that device might not be as Googlable in a year). –  Monica Cellio Oct 13 '13 at 2:42
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 4 down vote accepted

TL;DR: Please do CYLOR, but one should probably remove it. I would not try to argue that it is clearly forbidden or not, though I would assert that the issues below make this complex enough that one should avoid it until they can consult with a competent halachic authority.

There are three major issues, that I can see, with wearing one of these bands, like the Jawbone UP or the Fitbit Flex: Carrying outdoors, Measuring, and Electricity (as @trying mentioned, Writing is often discussed too). Each of these things are generally forbidden on Shabbos, with some exceptions.

  • Carrying
    In order to allow wearing one of these outdoors, one would have to argue that they are considered a "garment," (or for women, an "adornment"). This is not insurmountable, and one could argue that it's similar to a watch, which many authorities allow. CYLOR

  • Measuring
    The sages forbade any acts of measuring (where not essential for health or food), on Shabbos. These bands measure and record one's physical activity, and could certainly run up against this issue. CYLOR

  • Writing (because why not?)
    Could be an issue, although the fact there is only an electrical recording, and nothing visible (even on a microscopic scale), may make this a non-issue. Then again, it may not. CYLOR.

  • Electricity
    Essentially, these activity wristbands contain electrical sensors to measure things like movement and vibration. They then record the measurements, again, electrically. CYLOR

There are some factors that may allow one to be lenient in specific cases. For example, indirect usage can be used as a mitigating factor. @trying gives the example of opening a refrigerator, which could indirectly cause the compressor to turn on by lowering the temperature. Some authorities allow this, usually provided the effect is not immediate. It seems to me that activity bands cannot make use of this leniency, since there is no indirectness in one's activation of the sensors. They directly sense and record any movement by the wearer.

Another possibility alluded to by @trying, is the idea of "psik reisha," unintended results that were unavoidably caused by one's actions. Cases where the unintended result is also undesired are called "psik reisha d'lo nicha lei," and can be combined with other mitigating factors to allow certain activities. This is less clear, and I can see some arguing whether walking/moving/sleeping while wearing these bands would be activating the sensors "unintentionally." That seems unlikely to me: one is wearing the band for the express purpose of recording movement! Additionally, it would be difficult to argue that the resulting measurements are "lo nicha" (unwanted).

share|improve this answer
possibly related judaism.stackexchange.com/q/5591/759 –  Double AA Oct 14 '13 at 23:51
@DoubleAA Thanks! That's strictly mechanical, no? Isn't that about boneh and tikkun maneh, not electricity? (In other words, grama could apply there, but not in the same way here, even if you hold that electricity is under boneh.) –  HodofHod Oct 14 '13 at 23:59
add comment

firstly: cylor.

secondly: i see two possible question's:

(1) is it a problem to do something on shabbos which will trigger an electronic device?

(2) is this type of writing to the hardware considered "kosev"?

here are some sources which may shed some light on this topic.

though most Shabbat observant Jews permit opening and closing a refrigerator during Shabbat, some authorities require that the door only be opened when the refrigerator motor is already running. Otherwise, the motor will be caused to go on sooner by the increase in temperature indirectly caused by the flow of heat from the outside. Most refrigerators and freezers automatically set the motor to turn on and blow cold air whenever the thermometer registers a temperature that is too high to keep the food cold. However, Auerbach and most authorities permit opening the door because this result is indirect, and because there are additional grounds to be lenient.


While most rabbis have ruled that the example of intentionally letting cold air into the room to operate the thermostat constitutes a violation of Shabbat, if the person opens the window for some other, legitimate, reason, and the cold air enters as a side effect, no violation has occurred. Additionally, most agree that if a person who has no intention to operate the thermostat does something which happens to operate it, no violation has occurred.

however regarding the issue of writing, all i can say is Making a mark (even with a fingernail) for a significant purpose is considered kosev midrabanan. but im not a rav, so i wont try to make something up.

share|improve this answer
Some are lenient in the case of a refrigerator because of grama (indirectness). I don't think that activity bands like the UP or Flex have anything that could be considered grama. –  HodofHod Oct 13 '13 at 3:41
@HodofHod yes, but where do you define grama? according to some rabbanim, you can walk under a sensor that turns a light on on shabbos. –  tryingToGetProgrammingStraight Oct 13 '13 at 8:25
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.