Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is the number triple-6 good, bad, or neutral in Judaism?

How about numeric variations and combinations such as 216?

I know that 18 means 'life' due to Gematria calculations.

share|improve this question
1  
May be of interest: "Six Six Six"( which is a follow up to "Meah Shearim", both from the "Ask The Rabbi" section, at the Ohr Somayach website). – Tamir Evan Oct 1 '13 at 13:19
    
Meaningless, IINM. – Seth J Oct 1 '13 at 13:49
    
Related( Re: 216): judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/6606/… . – Tamir Evan Oct 7 '13 at 15:25
1  
How is that an improvement in formatting? – Double AA Feb 20 '14 at 15:05
    
Because I wanted the title to sound more decent. – tech Feb 20 '14 at 15:10
up vote 11 down vote accepted

This number has, to the best of my knowledge, no significance whatsoever in Judaism.

You can search according to gematria here but, as my teacher Rabbi Tzvi Aryeh Rosenfeld z'l said in a shiur, the average person shouldn't really come up with their own gematrios, generally speaking, and expect anything from them.

You will find that there are many gematrios with both good and bad implications for practically every value.

share|improve this answer
3  
No source, but that's because there isn't one. – yoel Oct 1 '13 at 7:25
    
kabbalahsecrets.com/?p=2265 see this – Gizbar Jun 25 '15 at 11:24
    
I Kings 10:14 states that King Solomon used 666 talents of gold to build the First Temple. (A biblical "talent" is an ~80 lb block.) Seems to be a neutral coincidence. Gold has been used for a lot of good things, as well as a lot of bad things. – Shalom Sep 10 '15 at 9:02

I believe that the number 666 have no significant tendency in Hebrew, and there for in Hebrew and Jewish Gematria. By checking both Hebrew genatria on http://www.c2kb.com/gematria/?word=666 and on Gematrix: http://www.gematrix.org/?word=666 shows no higher amount of results for each side.

share|improve this answer
    
מאה שערים lol . – Double AA Oct 7 '13 at 7:18
    
@DoubleAA, that's how we know it's a good number in Judaism. :) – Seth J Oct 7 '13 at 13:43

666 is very significant in two locations in Genesis.

First, in the beginning of creation, the values for light, dark, day and night add together into the sum 666. אור=207, חשך=328,יום=56, לילה=75. Though חשך commonly is written with a ״ו״ (vav), in the creation account it isn't.

Second, when Joseph becomes second in command of Egypt, Pharaoh renames him צפנת פנעח. The value of this name is 828. He demands Benjamin come down to Egypt. בנימין has a value of 162. 828-162=666. In regard to what 666 is in creation, it then fits in context of the Joseph narrative and the fulfillment of his final dream before his brothers threw him into the pit.

share|improve this answer
4  
Why is the fact that those gematrias work out to 666 "very significant"? Especially the one with subtraction. I've almost never seen subtraction used in gematrias where it's not obviously relevant. – Daniel Sep 10 '15 at 3:03
    
Hey Daniel. Perhaps "very" is a relative term. However, I find it significant in the sense that the four elements included in the first day add to 666. In my judgment that is noteworthy. Debate me if you disagree. – Brettk Sep 10 '15 at 4:42
    
Also, how do you determine what is "obviously relevant" and what isn't? To me, passing a connection off as irrelevant is cutting yourself short from a potential insight. – Brettk Sep 10 '15 at 4:43
    
except that as far as I can tell on a quick read, the word choshech never appears in Genesis 1. It always has a prefix (a vav, a hey or a vav-lamed) so making a point about its not being spelled with a vav internally is undermined by its use of other letters and then the sum reached is inaccurate. – Danno Sep 10 '15 at 10:24
2  
We need an "unclear what you're answering" flag. – Danny Schoemann Sep 10 '15 at 13:20

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.