Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If a Jew has a non-Jewish father and a Jewish mother, how is he or she:

  1. Called up to the Torah,
  2. Mentioned in legal documents, such as ketubot, and
  3. Mentioned for healing in mi shebeirach?

Does any of this vary by gender or community?

share|improve this question

'3. Is easy, mi shebeirachs are done with the mother's name.

'1. If he goes by a particular name you can often stick with it, but if he didn't have one, or if you're dealing with legal documents ...

'2. The Rabbinical Council of America handbook for rabbis says to use "so-and-so the son of [mother's name]." I spoke with one seasoned rabbi who said he's also seen people do "so-and-so the son of [maternal grandfather's] name", which doesn't call attention to the difference as much.

There's a larger-than-life character in the Talmud by the name of "Rabba the son of the son of Chana." The commentaries try to understand why he has such a name, with some suggesting that Chana was his grandfather (yes it may have been a man's name) who raised him, and others that there may have been a non-Jew in the family tree there someplace.

Regardless, I can't see why this would be different for a woman, except that a woman with a non-Jewish father may not marry a Cohen, but that's addressed elsewhere in formal documentation.

share|improve this answer
Thanks very much! I was wondering: does the RCA Handbook give any sources? – Shivaram Lingamneni Oct 8 '13 at 22:19
@ShivaramLingamneni, the current RCA Handbook is intended as something for quick reference and does not give sources. The previous handbook was more extensive, but to really do this right you'd probably consult a text all about documents, such as Nachalat Shiva. – Shalom Oct 8 '13 at 22:36
This may be a source for a part of the explanation of #2: Rama 139:3 – sharshi Jun 7 '15 at 14:39

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.