Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I understand that, as per the halakha, a Jew is absolutely obligated to save the life of a non-Jew, even if doing so requires of him that he desecrate Shabbat. (See, for example, this answer.) My question is specifically about the Mishna, Yoma 8:7.

The mishna in question reads as follows:

מי שנפלה עליו מפלת, ספק הוא שם ספק אינו שם, ספק חי ספק מת, ספק נכרי ספק ישראל - מפקחין עליו את הגל. מצאוהו חי - מפקחין עליו, ואם מת - יניחוהו

If a wall falls on somebody [on Shabbat] and it is uncertain whether or not he is there, whether he is alive or dead, or whether or not he is Jewish, we remove the rubble from him. If he is found to be alive, we continue removing it from him, but if he is dead we leave him.

Since the removal of rubble constitutes an activity that may be prohibited on Shabbat (perhaps the possibility of carrying four cubits in a public place), we don't do it if the only purpose it serves is to honour the dead. But in the event that it might enable us to save somebody's life (even if only for the briefest moment - Bartenura), we set aside Shabbat for the purpose of excavation.

It seems fairly obvious to me that the mishna's threefold formulation (there or not, alive or dead, Jew or gentile) is one in which the latter provisos would each render the search unnecessary if all doubt concerning them was removed. So, for example, if it is known for certain that the person is dead, we do not search through the rubble. If it is known for certain that the person is not there, we do not search through the rubble. If it is known for certain that the person is not Jewish, is not the implication likewise that we do not search through the rubble?

[Note: I reiterate that I am not asking a question about the halakha. The halakha mandates of us that we save a non-Jew's life on Shabbat. I am asking only about the correct historical interpretation of this mishna.]

share|improve this question
    
Why assume otherwise? –  sam Sep 12 '13 at 3:19
    
@sam - you mean, why assume that the mishna might mandate saving a non-Jew's life in the first place? –  Shimon bM Sep 12 '13 at 3:49
    
@ShimonbM I think he means: what other implication could you draw from the Mishna? –  Double AA Sep 13 '13 at 5:39
    
Why is it even a question? You save anyone's life. –  Jason Nov 12 '13 at 11:46
    
@Jason, it's a question about what the Mishna means, not about what the law/custom/"right thing to do" is. –  Shimon bM Nov 12 '13 at 12:03
show 4 more comments

1 Answer

The question is based on contemporary belief but in truth according to the strict letter of Halacha saving a non-Jews life on Shabbos by doing a Melacha (forbidden acts) is not permitted; I'll simply quote the Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 92:1 who says "Shabbos is pushed aside for Sakonas Nefoshos (life & death situations).. therefore it is a Mitzvah to desecrate Shaboss for a Kosher person (even if he sometimes does sins) who is in mortal danger" (See also the uncensored Shulchan Aruch Yore Dei'ah 158:1).

The link (in the question) that tries to portray a resounding 'yes', misrepresented R. M. Feinstein's words by saying "To quote R' Moshe Feinsten, "A refusal to treat a non-Jew on the Sabbath would be totally unacceptable...", the impression is that is is Halachikly unacceptable when in reality he's saying that it is socially unacceptable. In the Teshuvah itself RMF says to try to avoid the situation and he's only talking about a doctor who by law has the obligation to heal the sick or otherwise face repercussions. in the end he concludes with the words "one can rule that it (inaction by a doctor) is like a Sakanah (danger) and therefore one may permit it". - This is a far cry from "halakha mandates of us that we save a non-Jew's life on Shabbat".

For a short synopsis of some of that link's "sources" see Shearim Metzuyanim Bahalacha 92:1, 1) He brings an argument between the Pri Megadim who says we do not desecrate Shabbos for one who doesn't keep Shabbos Litai'ovon (for convenience reasons) and the Maharam Shik who is not sure about it. 2) He quotes the Pri Megadim who says that we do not desecrate Shabbos for a non-Jew and for one who doesn't keep Shabbos Lihach'is ('to anger G-d'). 3) He quotes the Chassam Sofer who says it is probably Halachakly permissible nowadays to ride in a wagon driven by a non-Jew to heal a non-Jew since inaction will cause the non-Jews to hate us for it and it may lead to danger for Jews. 4) He quotes the Divrei Chaim who says that a doctor is only allowed to desecrate Shabbos by doing actions prohibited by the sages but not by doing actions forbidden by Torah law. 5) He quotes the Yad Sholom who says that if by government law the doctor must desecrate Shabbos even by doing actions forbidden by Torah law, it may be permitted.

share|improve this answer
1  
How does this answer the question? –  Double AA Sep 13 '13 at 5:49
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.