Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In general, oral Torah isn't allowed to be written down (Gittin 60b).

For all generations until the Amorayim (at least according to Rashi), that Halacha was kept.

Yet, according to Rashi, Megillas Taanis (generally, a list of days one isn't allowed to fast) was written down much earlier, and was the first part of Oral Torah written down!

Couldn't it be kept memorized like all other Mishnayos? Why was it written down?

share|improve this question
Is Megillas Taanis considered Oral Torah? It's not like it was a longstanding tradition. Rashi just calls it "Devar Halacha" meaning it had legal import. I don't know if that makes it prohibited to record in writing. – Double AA Sep 4 '13 at 4:43
Agadata was written down before. I don't have exact sources now but the introductions to Aggadata by different Rabbis printed in the beginning of the Vilna Ein Yaakov bring proofs to this case, including the story of one Rabbi reading Aggadata on Shabbat (If I remember correctly) – Menachem Sep 8 '13 at 8:12

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.