Sign up ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In 2002, various news sources reported that a red heifer was found and the Temple Institute in Israel declared it kosher. Many of these sources later reported that the parah aduma was disqualified later that year, but I cannot find any information on why it was disqualified. Does anybody know why the 2002 red heifer was disqualified?

share|improve this question
It could be my computer screen, but that cow looks nothing like red. It looks like just a darker shade of brown, totally expected and common genetic variation. – A L Aug 26 '13 at 5:39
@AL Well it was originally accepted, so I guess it was considered to be the right color. – Daniel Aug 26 '13 at 13:17
I wonder on what basis they considered it to be the right color in the first place. – A L Aug 26 '13 at 19:16
@AL I don't know. It looks pretty red to me. I don't know exactly what color the parah aduma is supposed to be, though. – Daniel Aug 26 '13 at 19:19

2 Answers 2

According to - page 5 the Para Aduma born in 2002 was disqualified as it grew 3 white hairs.

share|improve this answer
This link seems to have gone dead. Are you able to find another source? – Daniel Dec 8 '14 at 18:42
@Daniel: Sorry I do not have another source. The link was active when the answer was submitted. – Gershon Gold Dec 8 '14 at 18:51
Yeah, I know it was. I was just hoping against the odds that I'd be able to find something again. It was hard enough to find the first time. That's why I posted the question. – Daniel Dec 8 '14 at 18:52
up vote 0 down vote accepted

Since the link in Gershon Gold's answer no longer works and I have been unsuccessful at finding any other information online, I decided to email the Temple Institute in Jerusalem. This is a quote from the email I received back:

Previous candidates for parah adumah have been disqualified after having grown more than two non-red hairs. A parah adumah born a year ago in New Jersey was disqualified after it became pregnant and gave birth.

So apparently the 2002 parah adumah did indeed grow more than two non-red hairs.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.