Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've seen both pronunciations (at the beginning of the second bracha in shmoneh esrei):

  • Aleph-patach, tav-kuhmuhtz, heh (implied stress on second syllable)
  • Aleph-kuhmuhtz-meseg, tav-kuhmuhtz, heh (noted stress on first syllable)
share|improve this question
Maybe it has to do with whether the next phrase "rav l'hoshi'a" is a continuation of this one or not. For what it's worth, a bunch of the ראשונים, including אבודרהם, have them as apparently separate phrases. But I'm just guessing. – WAF Sep 26 '10 at 3:22
I've seen a third: Aleph-patach, tav-kuhmuhtz, heh (stress marked on the first syllable ... to prevent one from making the mistake in your first option?) – Yahu Sep 26 '10 at 6:10
@Yahu - That's how it's pronounced in the song (which is now stuck in my head). – Seth J May 16 '11 at 20:00

It should be מלעיל, because of the rule of נסוג אחור

Since the next word (רב) has its stress on the first syllable, the stress of the preceding word moves up to avoid having two stresses in a row.

However, if רב להושיע is a separate phrase, this rule might not apply.

share|improve this answer

I don't if it's an official rule but I remarked (in Sepahradi Siddur like Ich Matsliah') that when Ata is after the attribute, the word is mileel (stress on the second to last syllable) but when the word is before the attribute, it's milera (stress on the last syllable)

Ex: At*a* guibor Ex: Melekh Rah'oum Veh'anoun *A*ta.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.