Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The prohibition of red women's clothes is well known, as is the definition of red in hilchos niddah. I hear many near-red garments being justified by calling them salmon, pink, purple, maroon, etc, but those colors would certainly be forbidden in hilchos niddah.*

What is the definition of red in regards to women's clothing?


* Black and dark brown are forbidden in hilchos niddah too, but obviously not in women's clothing.

share|improve this question
2  
very related: judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/252/… –  Charles Koppelman Aug 1 '13 at 15:14
    
Way do you think niddah has anything to do with it? Do you think red clothes are forbidden because they look like blood?? –  Double AA Aug 1 '13 at 15:40
1  
No, but very often we draw parallels in halacha to fill in missing information. Niddah is the only halachic area I know of, where red is defined. The back of tefillin's straps may not be red either, but there too, red is not defined. (Btw, I have actually heard the argument that red clothes are forbidden because they reminiscence menstrual blood.) –  NBZ Aug 1 '13 at 16:08
    
Can you source such a prohibition exists at all? –  Double AA Aug 1 '13 at 16:55
    
You state that this is a 'well known prohibition'. Do you have a source for this? –  Aaron Shaffier Aug 12 '13 at 5:51
show 1 more comment

1 Answer 1

http://judaism.stackexchange.com/a/1304/899

The difference between the two cases, of course, is that those other colors are a problem because they could have been dried blood, i.e. red at one time not currently red.

According to Rav Elyashiv zt"l (cited inHalichos Bas Yisrael, Vol. 1 7:8 footnote 11) the prohibition is only with bright red.

And it would seem that according to Rav Shlomo Zalman Aurbach zt"l that while red is prohibited it is permitted when it is an incidental accent to the garment.

share|improve this answer
1  
Concur. In the laws of Nida, only certain shades of red are actually problematic (this requires an expert rabbi who's trained on this), and some browns or blacks could have actually started off as red before oxidation. This has nothing to do whatsoever with the issue (Yirmeyahu and I will agree to disagree on whether it's a "prohibition" or simply a "concern") with red clothing, which is perceived as too attention-grabbing. If a woman bled red and it then oxidized to black, she's a Nida because she bled red. If a woman buys a neon-red hat and dyes it black, it will no longer grab attention. –  Shalom Aug 1 '13 at 15:33
    
Which page are you referring to from R' Elyashiv? –  NBZ Aug 1 '13 at 17:05
    
@NBZ, I'v edited the full reference in. –  Yirmeyahu Aug 2 '13 at 22:20
    
Sorry to burden you, but can you maybe quote? I don't see the relevant page on Google's preview, and in my Chassidishe neighborhood, I am afraid it will be difficult to find the book. –  NBZ Aug 4 '13 at 13:32
    
It is page 104, "According to HaGaon Rav Yosef Sholom Eliashiv, this prohibition only applies to bright red. Darker shads, such as burgundy, are acceptable." –  Yirmeyahu Aug 4 '13 at 16:11
show 1 more comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.