Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Matos, 32:2–4, we have (in loose translation):

The children of Gad and the children of R'uven came and said to Moshe, to El'azar the kohen, and to the heads of the congregation as follows:

Ataros, Divon, Ya'zer, Nimra, Cheshbon, El'ale, S'vam, N'vo, and B'on — the land [whose inhabitants] God struck[1] before the Jewish people — is a land for animals[2]. And [we] your servants have animals[2].

Then there's a break (a blank "s'suma" space in the Torah scroll), and the narrative continues (verse 5):

And they said:

If we have found favor in your eyes, the land should be given to [us] your servants for ownership: do not cross us over the Jordan.

What's with the paragraph break and the repeated "And they said"? It seems to be one long speech.


I see ibn Ezra (in his "long" commentary, the one in "mikraos g'dolos" chumashim) has a brief explanation, but I don't understand it; an explication of what he says is very welcome, certainly, among answers below. The Or Hachayim also has an explanation (that the new "they said" is for their request, whereas the first part is forestalling potential objections), but I don't see how that really explains the need for a new "they said" (or break), so, again, if someone can explain it, that'd be very welcome as an answer.


[1] Onkelos. (The tafsir of Rav Saadya Gaon has "the land God captured" or something like that.)
[2] The word used is one that denotes sheep and/or goats, actually. Hey, I said it was a loose translation!

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

R' Hirsch's commentary on verse 5 addresses this curiosity:

This repeated restarting their speech implies a pause, and shows that they themselves were not without suspicion as to how their proposition would be received. They required a pause to pull themselves together to continue bringing their request forward.

share|improve this answer
    
+1, and many thanks. –  msh210 Jul 7 '13 at 22:48
1  
Slightly different angle: they paused, hoping Moshe would volunteer a solution (he didn't). "Well dad you know it's a really long walk to college and a car would be nice ..." Or another tweak -- the pause wasn't in their speech per se, it's the Chumash telling us they should have stopped there, presenting the facts, and let Moshe propose the solution. –  Shalom Jul 8 '13 at 16:06
1  
@Shalom, your first idea is similar to how R' Hirsch interprets this sort of pattern in Lavan's conversation with Ya'akov Avinu regarding compensation. Lavan: "I have this religious feeling that you've been quite the good luck charm. (So, tell me you're flattered, and we won't have to get into the crass matter of compensation.)" Ya'akov: <Stares at Lavan silently, thinking "No, I've been quite the good worker!"> Lavan: "OK, what do you want to be paid." reddit.com/r/Judaism/comments/mxdfi/… –  Isaac Moses Jul 8 '13 at 16:29
1  
@IsaacMoses by your second sentence I was picturing XtraNormal bears. –  Shalom Jul 8 '13 at 17:04
    
RSRH's explanation may fit with the Or Hachayim's (mentioned in the question). –  msh210 Jul 9 '13 at 17:54
show 3 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.