Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

My question is somewhat simple: is there an honorific for particularly righteous, deceased non-Jews? Related: is זכרונו לברכה ever used for non-Jews? I don't recall ever having seen this.

EDIT: I mean honorifics appended to the end of the name.

share|improve this question
This calls forth how you define "Jewish." Avraham wasn't "Jewish" but there is a medieval text called Maaseh Avraham Avinu Alav Hashalom. I also found one called "AL MISHMAR BERITO SHEL AVRAHAM AVINU ALAV HASHALOM " which is, I think, more recent. – Danno Jun 25 '13 at 20:28
@danno I suspect he means post-Mosaic non-Jews. – Double AA Jun 25 '13 at 20:42
@Danno, I concur with Double AA that this question seems to be about non-Jews today and in more recent history than the Torah. – Seth J Jun 25 '13 at 20:54
rotten, I've heard or seen, "of blessed memory," if I'm not mistaken. – Seth J Jun 25 '13 at 20:56
@SethJ I assume you are correct, but if precedent exists to refer to someone that way, do we assume that that practice stopped being appropriate at some point? – Danno Jun 25 '13 at 21:08

By looking at the source we can understand the answer. OB"M or ZT"L comes from the pasuk (Mishlei 10:7) "The mention of a righteous man is for a blessing" Assuming that only a Jew can achieve the level of "Tzadik" that Mishlei is refering to, it seems that the honorific would only apply to Jews. [Non Jews can achieve the level of Pious Among the Nations at most see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Righteous_gentiles#cite_note-SSMH27-4 ]

NOTE: If you are writing/speaking in a forum where the honorific is used for non-jews then I believe that it should be used for derech eretz purposes.

share|improve this answer
"Assuming that only a Jew can achieve the level of 'tzadik'" seems like a pretty big assumption. On what do you base it? – Monica Cellio Jun 26 '13 at 14:36
did you read the link I added ? Non-Jews can be come "chasiedi umot haolam" but not Tzadik and even then its not clear if that is possible in this day and age according to all opinions. – eramm Jun 26 '13 at 15:16
@eramm Your link doesn't mention Tzaddik. As counter-examples, we know Noach was a Tzaddik (Gen 6:9), and Avraham called the righteous of Sodom "Tzaddikim" (Gen 18:23). Plus we know that Iyov and Nebuchadnezzar are called Eved Hashem, which is seemingly even higher than Tzaddik (though it might not be a linear hierarchy.) – Double AA Jun 26 '13 at 15:39
that is the point even though the link deals with a non-jew who is performing all the mitzvot that he possibly can they are still only called "chasiedi umot haolam". – eramm Jun 26 '13 at 16:29
@danno I suspect he means post-Mosaic non-Jews. – Double AA♦ 19 hours ago so that explains Noach and Sodom – eramm Jun 26 '13 at 16:34

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.