Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Bava Basra 14b, a ברייתא is quoted as saying "Moshe wrote his book (i.e. the Pentateuch), Parashat Bil'am, and [the Book of] Iyov." Why did the ברייתא even raise the issue of Moshe's authorship of Parashat Bil'am?

Does "Parashat Bil'am" in the ברייתא refer to Parashat Balak, which speaks of Bil'am, or another book? If so, do we know more about this book?

share|improve this question
    
    
Recall that Bilam's level of prophecy rivaled -- and possibly surpassed -- Moshe's. It's been suggested that the whole episode is one giant paragraph because usually the paragraph breaks were there to give Moshe time to digest; but Bilam's was beyond what he could understand. Hence the Gemara is saying that while Bilam's prophecy was higher, Moshe was still given a transmission to record (even if he didn't necessarily comprehend it). –  Shalom Jun 12 '13 at 18:27
    
@Shalom according to reb solaveitchik... –  MoriDoweedhYaa3gob Jun 12 '13 at 19:04
    
@double-aa did you learn bout that yourself or did you watch the naked archeologist to found out bout that one? m.youtube.com/watch?v=NHXksyaYIqA it is good stuff. I love this guy. Check out his site and all the other shows he did too. –  MoriDoweedhYaa3gob Jun 12 '13 at 23:31
    
@mori never seen that show before. –  Double AA Jun 13 '13 at 1:29
show 4 more comments

2 Answers

Parashath Bilaam is written with stories that Mosha Rabbeinu never experienced, for example the story with the donkey, no one was there but the donkey bilaam and the maloch. Also the sacrifices and such is from the perspective of bilaam and not Mosha Rabbeinu. Therefore, the gamoro in BB is saying that Mosha Rabbeinu did write it even though the perspective is not from Banei Yisroel but an outside source.

share|improve this answer
1  
Moshe didn't experience any of sefer B'reishit either. –  Monica Cellio Jun 12 '13 at 18:15
    
This sounds reasonable, +1. Did you make it up, or do you have a source for it? –  msh210 Jun 12 '13 at 18:15
    
@MonicaCellio, but he could have heard about it from those who did. Not (easily) so with Bil'am. –  msh210 Jun 12 '13 at 18:15
1  
Not as easily, but Bilaam does make another appearance, and there was all the contact with the Moabites (Balak's people). Or, as with B'reishit, God could have told him. –  Monica Cellio Jun 12 '13 at 18:17
1  
Elazar meets bilam when at war with midyan. Perhaps they schmoozed. –  Double AA Jun 12 '13 at 18:43
show 7 more comments

Levi Ginsburg in his commentary to the Yerushalmi explains that apparently there were people who claimed that the story of Bilaam was not realy part of the Torah but was added to it from an external source (he brings proof that such a claim existed from other sources in Chazal). Therefore, Chazal wanted to refute this and said that Moshe Rabbeinu wrote this as well and it is indeed part of the Torah.

share|improve this answer
    
Interesting. It would make sense that people would think this is from outside sources because there is definitely concurrence with the Bilaam of other local mythologies as @DoubleAA referenced –  Charles Koppelman Jun 18 '13 at 19:17
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.