Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I had always assumed that R' Yehoshua Ben Levi was an Amorah. However, we know he is quoted in the mishnah in Avos (Perek 6 Mishnah 2. Which is really a braisa, not a mishnah, but still a Tannaic source).

Are there any discussions about this (either way): if R' Yehoshua Ben Levi was a Tanna or an Amorah?

share|improve this question
For that reason I always thought he was a Tannah. – Seth J Jun 5 '13 at 20:30
Rabbi Google says he was a member of the first generation of Amoraim. – Seth J Jun 5 '13 at 20:32
@SethJ who says this? I saw from Google that not only Avos but other sources in Chazal (mishnah in Uktzin among others.) – Yehoshua Jun 5 '13 at 20:37

The Rambam mentions him in the הקדמה to משניות in his list of people mentioned in the משנה as "someone mentioned but not for his views in אסור והיתר".

R' Sherira Gaon lists him as the same generation as Rav and Shmuel, but does not list him as one of the people how is both a Tanna and an Amora. it would seem that R' Sherira hold that he is not a Tanna.

share|improve this answer
Is there anyway you can post a link to where R' Sherira Gaon says this. – Yehoshua Jun 5 '13 at 23:03
hebrewbooks.org/… – moses Jun 6 '13 at 17:36

The Tzla'ch in Berachot 26b says the גמרא can't ask on Rebbe Yehoshua ben Levi from a ברייתא because he lived at the end of the Tannayic era and, therefore can argue on a ברייתא

share|improve this answer
Hello Zecharia! Welcome to Mi Yodeya! Thank you very much for bringing this source to our attention. We hope you'll stick around and answer some more questions. – Daniel Nov 11 '14 at 4:15
+1, nice answer! I'll second @Daniel's welcome ....you might consider registering your account, which will give you access to more of the site's features. I'll definitely want to see you around! – Shokhet Nov 11 '14 at 4:16

I found the following today:

Rashi in Niddah Daf 18b says that R' Yehoshua Ben Levi was an Amorah,

שמעתתא. ר' יהושע בן לוי אמורא הוא

See here.

share|improve this answer
And we find him arguing on R' Yochanan in Yoma (about the verse for sequestering the Kohen) – Shmuel Brin Nov 26 '13 at 23:41
@Shmuel Brin - R' Yochanan is from the first generation of Amaroim, no? – Yehoshua Nov 28 '13 at 11:58
Yes. But he wouldn't argue on a Tanna (at least I haven't seen anyone saying R' Yochanan Tanna Hu UPalig). – Shmuel Brin Nov 28 '13 at 17:42
Actually, R' Yochanan may be a Tanna, See 1st chapter of Yevamos in sugya of tvul yom entering the Azara – Shmuel Brin Jan 17 at 20:55

The last Mishnah in Uktzin - perek 3 mishnah 12 - starts with a quotation from R' Yehoshua Ben Levi. Tosafos Yom Tov there says that according to the Rambam he is a Tanna. However, at the end of the Masechto, Tosafos Yom Tov disagrees and gives a reason why Rabeinu Hakodosh, the copiler of the Mishnah, put in this saying of R' Yehoshua Ben Levi, even though he was not a Tanna. London Shevat 5776

share|improve this answer
Welcome to the site. You dont have to mention your name in the answer. I have taken the liberty to edit it out. If you wish to reinclude it, just edit it back in. – mevaqesh Jan 17 at 20:30

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.