Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

One has to give kovod, honor to ones main rebbi (teacher). There are many dinim of how this kovod must be shown. One pertaining to the gemoro in eiruvin is that one must not be in a bath house at the same time because this lowers the "distance" and awe between them (unless the rebbi needs his services there). This din applies all his life even after he has finished studying under him.

What happens if he "surpasses" his rebbi and now his rebbi has to study under him? Does he still have to honor his "previous" rebbi?

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

If I'm not mistaken we refer to such a person as a "talmid chaver" -- I was Rabbi ABC's student, but now I've learned enough to be his colleague. It appears that some respect is still called-for.

Shulchan Aruch YD242:4 (among other places) discusses the concept. For instance:

One may not render psak in one's rebbi's presence ... however if one is 10 miles [or more] away from his rebbi and on rare occasion he was asked on a halachic matter he may answer; but to establish himself as a decisor and sit and rule on a regular basis -- even halfway around the world from his rebbi -- is prohibited unless his rebbi has died, or has given him permission to do so. ... [On the other hand,] a talmid chaver is prohibited [to render psak without permission] in a ten-mile radius, but outside of that is permitted.

[When permission is needed from a rebbi], even if one received permission from one rebbi, he must receive permission from all his "true rebbis." Rama comments: "true rebbi" here doesn't mean "learned the majority of your wisdom from him" as there can only be one of those; rather, "true rebbi" as opposed to a talmid chaver, i.e. someone who grew in Torah and became a colleague to his rebbi, nearly as great as him.

It's discussed further in Bava Basra 158b; Be'er Heiteiv YD242.9 quotes Maharik who points out, for instance, that the majority of Reish Lakish's torah learning (as well as his ordination) came from Rabbi Yochanan, yet Reish Lakish grew to the point where he was able to rule differently in Rabbi Yochanan's presence.

The whole bathhouse thing (see Rama, by the way, only an issue if everyone's naked. If you have underwear this doesn't apply) is limited to a rebbi muvhak, someone from whom you've learned a majority of your wisdom. Firstly those are rare today, and what's more it would sound from the language of shulchan aruch that talmid chaver and rabo muvhak are mutually exclusive concepts.

It's said that the Vilna Gaon's alef-bet teacher once visited Vilna and was given an extremely warm and reverential welcome. At which point the Vilna Gaon's first Gemara teacher tried visiting and was treated politely but not much more. "My first teacher taught me alef-bet and that's served me well my whole life; but the Gemara that you taught me, I had to reteach myself in a whole different way", said the Gaon. (Or something to that effect.)

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you, this looks good. Do you have a source? –  Adam Mosheh Jul 2 '13 at 16:07
1  
@AdamMosheh thanks I've added sources. –  Shalom Jul 3 '13 at 8:49
add comment

Yes. Pirkei Avot Chapter 6 Mishna 3

One who learns from his fellow a single chapter, or a single law, or a single verse, or a single word, or even a single letter, he must treat him with respect. For so we find with David, king of Israel, who did not learn anything from Achitofel except for two things alone, yet he called him his "master," his "guide" and his "intimate," as is stated (Psalms 55:14), "And you are a man of my worth, my guide and intimate friend." Surely we can infer a fortiori: if David, king of Israel, who learned nothing from Achitofel except for two things alone, nevertheless referred to him as his master, guide and intimate, it certainly goes without saying that one who learns from his fellow a single chapter, a law, a verse, a saying, or even a single letter, is obligated to revere him. And there is no reverence but Torah, as is stated (Proverbs 3:35; 28:10), "The sages shall inherit honor" "and the integral shall inherit good"; and there is no good but Torah, as is stated (ibid. 4:2), "I have given you a good purchase; My Torah, do not forsake it."

share|improve this answer
3  
I may be wrong but I think that there is a difference between the general law of respecting one's teachers and one's main Rabbi. –  Hacham Gabriel Jun 2 '13 at 14:19
    
@eramm - I was thinking the same thing! –  Adam Mosheh Jul 2 '13 at 16:08
    
@HachamGabriel - Is it possible that we have to distinguish between treating someone with respect and treating someone with honor? What about simply being respectful to that person (derech eretz). I think that there would be some sort of chilluk. –  Adam Mosheh Jul 2 '13 at 16:11
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.