Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Has an idol been clearly defined as to what is an Idol and what is not?

share|improve this question

closed as unclear what you're asking by Seth J, Double AA Jul 24 '13 at 8:43

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
For what purposes? I imagine there may be multiple definitions in differing contexts (though maybe not). –  msh210 May 28 '13 at 7:42
    
For judging an object to be an Idol . –  Ali May 28 '13 at 7:50
    
@msh210 Perhaps for purposes relating to avodah-zarah? –  Double AA May 28 '13 at 9:11
    
Your title doesn't match the body. –  Double AA May 28 '13 at 12:26
1  
@DoubleAA, Ali, re the requirement to destroy it? re the ban on worshiping it? re the ban on owning it? re the ban on deriving benefit from it? re the process of 'nullifying' it? For what purposes are you asking? There may be different answers depending. –  msh210 May 28 '13 at 17:21

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Yes it is defined but as often occurs in Jewish law, there's a tremendous amount of nuance from case-to-case. But I will simply point out that one can theologically violate "worshipping something other than God" without necessary rendering a specific object an "idol." (E.g. if someone walks onto my yard and bows down to my apple tree and tries to worship it, he is committing idolatry, but he had no ownership of my tree and therefore didn't render it an "idol." I can still use that tree. Versus a tree that was planted for the purposes of worship is prohibited from use.)

The Talmud's tractate of "Avoda Zarah" (foreign worship) devotes its third chapter to this, what's called an idol and what's more likely a decoration. E.g. a rule of thumb had been that a Greek/Roman statue of a person holding a globe, staff, or bird was likely actually idolized, whereas a statue of a person holding something else (e.g. a torch?) was probably just symbolic. Similarly there's the story of a Greek bathhouse with an image of Aphrodite on it; a rabbi still used the bathhouse. Asked how he could do so, he explained (after exiting the bathhouse, as we don't discuss Torah in a bathhouse): "you Greeks didn't say, let's build a bathhouse to glorify Aphrodite. You said, let's build a bathhouse because we want one, and we'll put an Aphrodite on it to glorify the bathhouse!"

Later works such as Shulchan Aruch discuss many more cases (e.g. the Hispanic-products aisle in many supermarkets contains candles with pictures of saints on the glass jar -- while I strongly recommend buying regular candles instead, if this was the only candle available, a rabbi should ask -- was that truly made for the purpose of worship, or was that made by Acme Candle Co. who would just as happily put SpongeBob Squarepants on the jar if it sells better?)

share|improve this answer
    
Good andwer You have not addressed the issue of people making the Idol as a medium of worship to one God. –  Ali May 28 '13 at 14:50
    
@shalom it wasn't a picture if Aphrodite it was an actual statue if I remember correctly –  MoriDoweedhYaa3qob May 28 '13 at 18:12

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.