Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Normally when faced with eating two foods where one takes a "mizonos" blessing for grain products, and another takes an all-encompassing "shehakol" blessing, we try to eat the mizonos food first. How do you do this with an ice cream cone where you can't get to the cone without first eating the ice cream which is shehakol?

share|improve this question
2  
The question in the title is not exactly the same as the one in the body. Regarding the one in the title, see here. –  Fred May 19 '13 at 7:06
1  
@6red - you were right. Thanks to msh210 for fixing it. –  Bruce James May 19 '13 at 12:16
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 5 down vote accepted

OU.org says the cone does not need a brocho; it is subordinate to the ice cream.

Even if ice cream is eaten in a cone, only Shehakol is necessary, since the cone is eaten only because of the ice cream and is clearly subordinate to it. Its purpose is actually not so much to be eaten as to hold the ice cream and to prevent the hands from becoming soiled (see Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chaim 212b; Mishnah Berurah 212:5; Kaf Hachaim 15). However, if you specifically use a sugar cone because you enjoy eating it, Mezonot must also be said before eating the cone.

For the enjoyed sugar cone, I suggest biting a piece off the bottom after saying the brocho.

share|improve this answer
2  
"biting a piece off the bottom" would cause the ice cream to leak, I think. That's why I suggested biting from the lip. –  msh210 May 19 '13 at 23:32
    
@msh210 Exactly. –  Seth J May 26 '13 at 1:47
add comment

Say "m'zonos" and nibble a bit off of the lip of the cone, or eat some other food that has the same b'racha.

share|improve this answer
    
That was my first instinct (practical advice essentially), but then I considered that it may be impractical in some cases (e.g. no other food available and unstable ice cream balanced on the cone), which likely motivated the question. –  Fred May 19 '13 at 7:47
1  
OU.org says the cone does not need a brocho; it is subordinate to the ice cream. "Even if ice cream is eaten in a cone, only Shehakol is necessary, since the cone is eaten only because of the ice cream and is clearly subordinate to it. Its purpose is actually not so much to be eaten as to hold the ice cream and to prevent the hands from becoming soiled <snip> However, if you specifically use a sugar cone because you enjoy eating it, Mezonot must also be said before eating the cone. –  Avrohom Yitzchok May 19 '13 at 10:43
1  
@AvrohomYitzchok -souns like a winning answer to me, not a comment. –  Bruce James May 19 '13 at 12:17
    
@AvrohomYitzchok, yes. The question seems to be assuming a case where both b'rachos are to be said, so I assumed that in my answer also. Not only a sugar cone would require a b'racha but a waffle cone eaten because the eater likes waffle cones (I assume. CYLOR). –  msh210 May 19 '13 at 23:31
add comment

My solution is by far more fun than the other two answers. Say Mezonoth, bite the point off the bottom of the cone, say Shehakol, and suck the ice cream through the bottom!

share|improve this answer
    
+1. You may need to eat a little from the top before the ice cream melts sufficiently; or, if it's melting already, you may need to say "shehakol" fast. –  msh210 May 19 '13 at 23:33
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.