Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If a woman was a "ro'eh machmis tashmish" (she saw blood after having relations), does the day that it happened go into the account of her "vestes" (the days that she will have to be concerned she may see blood and will therefore have to be separate from her husband)?

If it does, does she need to be concerned for the "oneh benonis" relative to the day she saw dam from the relations (30 days later)? Does she have to make an accounting of what the "haflagah" (the time between the last time she saw blood normally and the time now that she saw machmis tashmish) would be and be concerned for that as well?

share|improve this question
1  
@Yehoshua, You cant really expect an answer from a site like this. Does anyone here know the noda beyuda on seeing dam during relations not after. Does anyone here know how to 'count' vestos. One really needs a computer program. Which rov has one. Can mention a really good book on the subject with proper examples if asked to here, published by Feldheim. Give these example dates to any rov and see if he knows it. Very unlikely. –  user2709 May 7 '13 at 21:41
    
@shulem your comments should hopefully inspire someone to prove you wrong ;)...Thanks for helping me to get better (hopefully well-sourced) answers! –  Yehoshua May 7 '13 at 21:45
3  
I'm going to delete now all the comments that don't help the question. –  Double AA May 7 '13 at 22:34
    
@Yehoshua You should specify whether she felt pain at the time of relations or not, as the halakha varies widely with the answer. –  Rabbi Michael Tzadok May 8 '13 at 14:42
add comment

1 Answer

In Shulchan Aruch Horav Siman 187 Se'if Katan 39 it says that she has to be Choshesh for Onas Hachodesh (meaning the day of the month). As far as Haflogo she would have to see a second time Macmas Tashmish to create a Haflogo (but she does not count the Haflogo from the last regular ראייה to the first time she sees Macmas Tashmish -he explains at length why did is so). As far as Oinah Beinunus, the Alter Rebbe (also the Noda Behudah Mahadurah Kamah YD 46 says that that is the opinion of most Poskim) compares RMT to a woman who sees 'because of things happening in her body (like jumping, eating garlic, or sneezing etc.)' mentioned in Siman 189 (from Se'if 17 and on) and there he says in Se'if Katan 91 that she also has to be Choshesh for Oinah Beinunis as well.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.