Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is the dictionary that he wrote still in copyright, or has it entered the public domain? If not, who owns the rights to it?

share|improve this question
2  
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's not a Torah question but a legal one. –  Shmuel Brin Jun 9 at 6:08
1  
@ShmuelBrin, this is a close one, but given sufficient motivation, it could be on topic. I'm going with leaving open because the most obvious motivation for the question is the desire to publish a new version (electronic or in print), which in the case of this dictionary is Judaism motivated. –  Yishai Jun 9 at 18:29
    
@Yishai The Halachic question is a dup. The legal question is off topic. –  Shmuel Brin Jun 9 at 20:02
    
@ShmuelBrin, a dupe of what? –  Yishai Jun 9 at 20:11
    
@ShmuelBrin, this is not a legal question, best addressed to a lawyer; it's a Jastrow Dictionary question, best addressed to someone who knows about the Jastrow Dictionary. Given that this is a volume used pretty much exclusively in the study of Judaism, it's fair to expect that experts on Judaism would know something about it. –  Isaac Moses Jun 9 at 20:27

1 Answer 1

up vote 12 down vote accepted

I believe it's been out of copyright for a while. You can access the whole book online here: http://www.tyndalearchive.com/TABS/Jastrow/

It's also available on Google Books, though I only found Vol. 2 there.

Vol 1 and Vol 2 are available on Hebrewbooks.org.

share|improve this answer
1  
I'm not so sure about that. The edition I have (Judaica Press, 1989) carries a copyright of theirs from 1971 (even though the original was published in 1903 and should surely have expired by then). –  Alex Sep 6 '10 at 2:08
    
It should be that that contents are out of copyright, but the layout(the way the specific pages look) is still under copyright, but the most recent publishers. –  Rabbi Michael Tzadok Sep 6 '10 at 12:41
3  
The 1989 (and 1971, I guess) editions are facsimiles of the 1903 one. So there's no new layout to be copyrighted. –  Alex Sep 6 '10 at 17:26
2  
@Alex, Sometimes booksellers/publishers will try to assert copyright when they have none. –  Seth J Feb 27 '12 at 19:46

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.