Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

May the sell of chometz be done with a young gentile that in Judaism would be considered a "katan" in terms of halacha and therefore perhaps wouldn't be able to have his buying and selling be "valid" according to Halacha?

I suppose this question would apply to many other halachos however I'm asking it now with this example because it is from inyunei d'yoma.

share|improve this question
I have no sources, but as the transaction needs to also be valid by civil law, and a minor cannot sign contracts, it would seem that selling to a katan would be prohibited. – andrewmh20 Mar 24 '13 at 0:42
up vote 3 down vote accepted

In Sharei Teshuvah on Orach Chaim 448:15 he quotes Sh"ut Veshav Hakohen who concludes that Bdi'avad -especially by Chometz Derabanan- one could rely on those who say that a Koton is Koneh rental of property.

share|improve this answer
@Mekubal The link to the article from R' Hoffman is not working. Did he quote this? I'm surprised if it wasn't quoted. Would have saved the whole article ;). – Yehoshua Mar 24 '13 at 22:52
I'm just wondering what would constitute Chometz Derabanan? – Hacham Gabriel Mar 25 '13 at 3:32
I'm guessing Chometz Sheovar Alav Es Hapesach. – Meir Zirkind Mar 25 '13 at 3:40
That's the only example of "chometz d'rabbanan"? – Yehoshua Apr 21 at 20:08

Rabbi Yair Hoffman just wrote an article on this that can be found at this link. He goes through a number of sources from the Gemarra through the Rishonim and into the Achronim, and is well worth the read. For those who want just the conclusion it is this:

It would seem that in order to avoid a debate on the matter, one should most definitely be stringent and transact the sale only with a mature, adult non-Jew.

share|improve this answer
His article is about liability for mitzvos b'ne Noach. His final paragraph, which you quote, is about maturity for conducting transactions: but I don't see how he gets to that from the rest of the article. It seems quite a leap. – msh210 Mar 24 '13 at 5:48
One naturally leads to another. A contract cannot be conducted with a minor who lacks understanding. He is trying to determine the age of accountability for a non-Jew. – Rabbi Michael Tzadok Mar 24 '13 at 6:40
Yes, a contract cannot be conducted with a minor who lacks understanding. Yes, he is trying to determine the age of accountability for a non-Jew. But who says understanding and accountability are reached simultaneously -- especially (but not only) according to the views he cites that accountability starts at birth? I'm not blaming you: you found an answer, cited it, quoted it. But I don't see where he gets it from. – msh210 Mar 24 '13 at 8:26

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.