Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A popular topic discussed sometimes at length in Yeshivas I would like to pose the question here with a few additional points:

What is a "migu"? How is it used in Shas? What is a "classic" (or the classic) example of a migu? Are there any "earlier seforim" (before the achronim) that explain what a "migu" is, how it's used, etc What is an example of the concept of a "migu" being used in practical halacha? (source.)

share|improve this question
    
    
I always read it as "מִגּוֹ." We also find many times something like "מִגּוֹ מַשְׁרִיתָא" in Targum Onkelos (e.g. Devarim 2:14), meaning "from within." –  b a Feb 27 '13 at 3:16
add comment

1 Answer 1

Migu is a Rabbinic concept in which a witness establishes his reliability by his choice of defenses. It goes like this: a claimant has a sure-win claim, but instead offers an alternative defense which, on its own, we would not believe but for the fact that he could have chosen the sure-win claim. We say to ourselves, "if this guy was lying, he would have chosen a better argument."

Many cases come to mind. In Kesuvos 12b there is a case where a woman claims she lost her signs of virginity when she was raped -- she is believed because she could have claims that she lost the signs due to an accident (and thereby retain her right to a 200 zuzim value to her kesubah; because she claimed to be raped, she only will get 100 zuzim).

At Bava Basra 31a, Shimon claims to own land and Reuven disputes. Shimon has a migu claim: He says that he has lived on the land for 3 years and thereby acquired the land. He could have claimed that he had bought the land from Reuven's father and, although he has no receipt, his possession of the land for 3 years supports his claim. By making the lesser argument, we assume that he's telling the truth. However, in the Bava Basra case, Reuven trumps Shimon by bringing two witnesses. Migu is good; witnesses are better.

A friend of mine, a convert, was living in Jerusalem and the rabbis were reluctant to accept his conversion because the rabbis on the convert's bet din were not on the official government list of approved conversion rabbis. Converts in Israel are questioned because conversion grants one the capability of making aliyah with full immigration rights. Therefore there is incentive for an insincere person to "convert." But my friend was able to bring proof that he had divorced his wife by giving her a get. They accepted that as a migu. He could have claimed to have been born Jewish and would not have been easily disputed. But the fact that he admitted to giving his wife a get and that he was a convert demonstrated that he was a ger tzedek because an insincere convert would not have bothered to divorce his wife with a get.

share|improve this answer
1  
א"ר אסי מנין להפה שאסר הוא הפה שהתיר מן התורה שנאמר את בתי נתתי לאיש הזה לאשה לאיש אסרה הזה התירה ל"ל קרא סברא היא הוא אסרה והוא שרי לה אלא כי איצטריך קרא לכדרב הונא אמר רב דא"ר הונא אמר רב מנין לאב שנאמן לאסור את בתו מן התורה שנאמר את בתי נתתי לאיש הזה למה לי מיבעי ליה לכדתני ר' יונה דתני ר' יונה את בתי נתתי לאיש הזה הזה ולא ליבם. found in Kesubos 22a –  moses Feb 26 '13 at 19:10
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.