Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The three basic texts that R' Yisroel Salanter wanted people to learn were Chovos HaLevavos, Mesilas Yesharim and Cheshbon HaNefesh. (source: here)

what is the difference between Chovos Halevavos and Mesilas Yesharim

which book should a beginner focus on first and why?

what about someone more advanced?

share|improve this question
3  
This question would be a great deal more compelling if you'd include some information about why you think that anyone should learn either of these works, why a beginner should, and why a beginner and a more advanced student may have different needs here. –  Isaac Moses Feb 18 '13 at 14:44
1  
...and what you're considering a "beginner". –  msh210 Feb 18 '13 at 18:25
1  
Also perhaps allow for studying any other book. As it is now, everyone has to choose between only these two. –  Double AA Feb 18 '13 at 18:29
1  
@R.Sebag Then perhaps include some explanation as to why the user is being forced to learn one and exactly one of these two books. –  Double AA Feb 18 '13 at 19:19
1  
see above. iadded to the question –  ray Feb 18 '13 at 19:20

2 Answers 2

Mesilat Yesharim is short and straight to the point while Chovos Halevavos is much longer and gives alot of background such as trusting in God.

The trait of Zehirus (watchfulness) starts immediately after the introduction in Mesilat Yesharim.

In Chovos Halevavos, the trait of zehirus (watchfulness) starts in Gate #3 after many introductions.

I also find that Chovos Halevavos tries to motivate the reader to strive for very high spiritual levels and this can be somewhat daunting for beginners

share|improve this answer

Rabbi Shlomo Aviner suggests that Mesilas Yesharim (MY) be studied before Chovos Halevavos (CH) since MY is a written in a more accessible style and the topics are more basic. CH is deeper and the language is harder.

THinking about it some more with MY you will come away with more actionable tasks. i.e zerisus, zehiros, etc.. with CH the take aways are more in the realm of thought and contemplation (i.e Bitachon, Belief in Gods' unity, etc... )The author of CH calls those things which are actionable "Duties of the limbs" whereas he writes that his sefer (CH) focuses on those traits that are dependent on contemplation - "Duties of the heart" hence the name of the sefer.

I feel that they are both great and you should get yourself a teacher and start right away. you wont lose with either and understanding one book is not dependent on understand the other.

share|improve this answer
2  
Thanks for clearly explaining what was said at that site. Welcome to mi.yodeya and I hope to see you around. –  Gershon Gold Feb 19 '13 at 13:58
    
Some secular people seem to grab on to the ordered lifestyle that the Torah offers so in that case MY is a good choice. Most Mussar teachers did not learn SHaar HaYichud and Shaar HaBechina. If Kiruv is the goal you may want to consider Derech HaShem as well –  eramm Feb 20 '13 at 15:23
    
See this question for a discussion of whether one should study the philosophical proofs of God's existance in Chovot HaLevavot's Sha'ar HaYichud or not. –  Chanoch Aug 15 '13 at 13:27

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.