Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

At Exodus 18:6, Moshe's father-in-law, Yisro, tells Moshe that he had come with Moshe's wife and "her sons." Why didn't he say to Moshe that she had come with "your sons"?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 8 down vote accepted
  • Alshich explains that Yisro was worried: Perhaps Moshe would not be interested in a Midyanite woman and would rather marry a Jewess. He therefore emphasized that he brought "her two sons" with him (and not "his two sons"), since a man comes to like his wife because of the children she bears him, and this would persuade Moshe to remarry Tziporah. (See also Maskil Ledovid on Rashi for a very similar explanation)

  • Rabbeynu Bechaya explains that the way of the Pesukim is to link sons to their mother and daughters to the father. (see Rashi 46:15 "The males are attributed to Leah and the females to Jacob").

share|improve this answer
    
Good answer -- better than I could find, or the half-dozen rabbis I asked this weekend. But is there any possibility that Yisro was being critical of Moshe; suggesting that while Moshe was in Egypt, Tzipora was raising his children? –  Bruce James Feb 4 '13 at 19:41
1  
@BruceJames Sounds like an interesting idea, but I would be hesitant to accept that for a couple reasons - a) Moshe originally planned to bring his wife and children with him to Egypt and was later persuaded not to by Aahron for their own safety (see Rashi to 18:2). Surely Yisro would understand that Moshe had his children's best interests in mind. b) Yisro seems worried that Moshe will not come out and meet him (see Rashi to 18:6) and is trying to convince him to come. It will be ill-timed at that point for him to be telling him off. –  Michoel Feb 4 '13 at 23:27
    
Regarding your point b): It is that Rashi that led me to ask the question. If Yisro was worried that Moshe would not come out to see him, that might be more of a reason to say that he brought "your children" rather than "her children." The opinion of the Alshich might make sense it that was the mind-set of that generation. I would think in our era the father might interpret Yisro's statement as if to say, "your sons are no longer yours." Interestingly, I think this is the last we hear about Moshe's sons. –  Bruce James Feb 5 '13 at 14:36
    
@BruceJames Rashi there does seem to strengthen the question, but see the Maskil Ledovid I quoted who writes that this is actually the basis for Rashi's remark. –  Michoel Feb 5 '13 at 23:28

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.