Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If someone says "I believe that the Mishnayos/Braisos/Toseftas are accurate, but I think that the Gemara made mistakes and has no holiness.

Is such philosophy heresy?

What about someone who argues on specific Mishnas?

What about someone who argues on ALL the Mishnas (he believes that there was an Oral Torah, but it got forgotten)?

share|improve this question
2  
'made mistakes' and 'has no holiness' are different claims. –  Double AA Jan 4 '13 at 18:19
    
Do you mean Bavli or Yerushalmi? –  Double AA Jan 4 '13 at 18:19
    
What do mean the Mishna etc. is accurate? That it is an absolute truth? –  Double AA Jan 4 '13 at 18:37
    
@DoubleAA 2. either –  Shmuel Brin Jan 4 '13 at 18:54
    
then: related judaism.stackexchange.com/q/13058/759 –  Double AA Jan 4 '13 at 18:55

1 Answer 1

כופר בתורה שבעל פה does not mean that he denies the theoretical existence of any תורה שבע"פ but that he denies the actual תורה שבע"פ in our possession--so if someone denies the authentic תורה שבע"פ he would fall under that category. Furthermore, such a person would be included under the category of מכחיש מגידיה as someone who denies the reliability of the bearers of our tradition (Rambam, Hil. Teshuvah 3:8).

share|improve this answer
    
Is every line of Gemara a received tradition from Sinai? –  Double AA Mar 8 '13 at 19:34
1  
oh you're answering his last question. –  Double AA Mar 8 '13 at 19:35

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.