Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have heard that the ban or cherem of Rabbenu Gershom has expired. Is this the case? If so, what are the ramifications visa vi his enactments?

share|improve this question
    
Are you specifically talking about the polygamy one? –  Fred Jan 3 '13 at 19:03
    
...or any of the other bazillion takkanot? judaism.stackexchange.com/a/18867/759 –  Double AA Jan 3 '13 at 19:05
    
@DoubleAA From all the hullabaloo going on around here, I assumed that it was referring to the one about reading a person's private info, and I focused my answer accordingly. –  Fred Jan 3 '13 at 19:09
    
@Fred a reasonable guess. –  Double AA Jan 3 '13 at 19:10
    
When a rosh kollel figured out that Rabbeinu Gershom's ban on having multiple wives was over, he found it cause to celebrate. "This will be wonderful for the young men in kollel -- they can't survive on just one income!" ;-) –  Bruce James Jan 23 '13 at 16:58
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 2 down vote accepted

From footnote #2 to an article on torah.org:

We must realize that Rabbeinu Gershom actually issued many Takanos (injunctions) and Cheramim (bans). Some were not accepted at all, some were restricted only to his generation, some were only accepted in the European Jewish communities, some had a specific time limitation on them, and others were accepted and embraced by all Jewish communities everywhere with no time restrictions. Similarly, some were enacted as a "fence" to ensure the keeping of Halacha, while others were enacted for the benefit of the social fabric of Jewish communities. Therefore, we can not compare the effectiveness and limitations of one of his Takanos to another.

For example, Rabbeinu Gershom's ban on bigamy was only accepted in the Jewish communities of Europe, and was originally only instituted until the end of 5000 years from the creation of the world (758 years ago). The only reason why we still continue this ban today is because the Rishonim who lived at the time that the ban was to expire decided to extend it indefinitely, as is stated by the Rema (Even HaEzer 1:10)....

The Cherem that we are discussing in our case, i.e. not to read another person's private information, was also instituted by Rabbeinu Gershom to be effective indefinitely, and was also accepted and embraced universally by all Jewish communities. Additionally, it was created as a "fence" so that people not transgress Torah prohibitions, i.e. the prohibitions of Loshon Hara (slander) and Rechilus (gossip) that would result from people knowing other's private business, and harm and damage that may befall people whose information becomes public knowledge, including informing (Mesira). This was evidently a prevalent problem in the times of Rabbeinu Gershom. Therefore, this Cherem must also be considered a "Cherem D'Oraysoh", and one must be stringent regarding it even in a case of doubt, as stated above.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Per Dinonline

The prohibition against polygamy was enacted by Rabbeinu Gershom, some thousand years ago. Some have suggested that the ban was only enacted until the end of the 5th thousand years (in the Jewish calendar), or the year 1239. Others, however, suggest that the ban was only made for one thousand years, and this might be the source from which one can derive that the ban will expire in the year 2037. Yet, the precise date of the ban is unknown, and some have written that although the thousand years are already up, the ban has been continually accepted as binding.

One way or another, the ban is mentioned in Shulchan Aruch (Even Ha’ezer 1) without any time limit, and it is unlikely that current the social structure will permit its disbanding anytime in the near future.

However a close reading of the Shulchan Aruch does imply a time limit.

share|improve this answer
1  
    
Beat me to it! Yes, this is a problematic source then. –  Double AA Jan 3 '13 at 19:00
1  
A close reading? An explicit reading! He says "This will expire." –  Double AA Jan 3 '13 at 19:07
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.