Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

When we list the Matriarchs in prayers (such as the Amidah in the version including the matriarchs, or in the traditional blessing for one's daughters on Friday night), we say them in the order: Sarah, Rebekah, Rachel, Leah. Why is this? The patriarchs are generally listed in order of age, which seems like a natural order of precedence; and similarly, apart from Leah the matriarchs are listed in order of age.

share|improve this question
+1 We have this order of the matriarchs already in the Talmud (eg Horayot 10b) and the patriarchs already in verses in the Bible (eg. Genesis 50:24) – Double AA Nov 27 '12 at 19:38
@DoubleAA isn't that the (or at least an) answer, then? – yoel Nov 27 '12 at 19:52
@yoel, partly, but it just moves the "why" point earlier -- why did they do it that way, if that's the pattern? – Monica Cellio Nov 27 '12 at 20:00
up vote 9 down vote accepted

Likutei Dinim Toras haKohanim Siman 75 says that since Rachel was the one Yaakov had in mind to marry first therefore Rachel is listed first.

share|improve this answer
What is the relation between intent to marry and listing that this should be relevant? – Double AA Apr 8 '14 at 17:44

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.