Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why was Aaron, the brother of Mōšéh, not punished by death together with idolators (others who have sinned with the Golden Calf) when Mōšéh came from the mountain?

Why was Aaron treated differently?

share|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

The Gemara in Sanhedrin 7a says that Aaron's intention was noble. He saw that the Yidden had stoned Chur to death and realised if he opposed them he would meet the same end. By killing Aaron the Jews would commit an unparalleled crime, of Killing a Kohein Venovi. Just take a look at the retribution God exacted for the killing of Zecharyah, a Coheon Venovi. Aaron realised it would be better for them to serve idols then commit such a grave sin.

In addition Rashi says that he was hoping to delay them until Moses came and hoped that the women would put up a fight not to give up their jewelry so quick.

share|improve this answer
Who is the yidden? Chur means Hur right? – Jim Thio Jan 4 '14 at 4:12
@JimThio Yidden refers to the Jewish Nation. I assume that your Hur is my Chur. – Yehuda Jan 4 '14 at 17:12

In the ancient Near East, gods were worshiped at their altars. This is where each god was thought to live - its altar. A very common decoration under the god was a gold bull or calf.

Although we wanted to worship an idol and were creating the calf to that end, Aaron had a different idea in mind. He wanted to create a throne for G-d. He said, "אֵלֶּה אֱלֹקיךָ יִשְׂרָאֵל" "This is your G-d, Israel," and gestured not to the calf, but to the space above the calf. Aaron knew G-d's true nature and was trying to use symbolism the Israelites would understand. But unfortunately, they failed to understand it and treated the calf as an god itself.

After some Googling, it seems this idea is advanced by Michael Coogan in A Brief Introduction to the Old Testament: The Hebrew Bible in its Context. From Wikipedia:

Another understanding of the golden calf narrative is that the calf was meant to be the pedestal of [G-d]. In Near Eastern art, gods were often depicted standing on an animal, rather than seated on a throne. This reading suggests that the golden calf was merely an alternative to the ark of the covenant or the cherubim upon which [G-d] was enthroned.

share|improve this answer
The problem with this interpretation I see is that then there was no sin at all or at least not idolatry, for it was not an idol, just an altar. – MichaelS Nov 21 '12 at 1:26
@MichaelS And to Aaron, that's what it was. But to Israel, it was an idol. They missed his symbolism. – Charles Koppelman Nov 21 '12 at 2:14
That would explain it. Thanks. – MichaelS Nov 23 '12 at 0:32

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.