Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Why is it that Hashem promised never to destroy the Kosel?

share|improve this question
5  
Who says He did? –  Isaac Moses Jul 20 '10 at 20:05
1  
The Medrash Rabbah –  SimchasTorah Jul 20 '10 at 22:21
5  
@SimchasTorah: Can you link to the Medrash, or at least quote the source? –  Menachem Sep 9 '11 at 3:06
1  
@H'Gabriel That midrash says The Western Wall of the Mikdash. The kotel is the western retaining wall of the Temple Mount. Different walls. –  Double AA Dec 26 '11 at 4:22
1  
For those not following, I am referring to the midrash rabba shir hashirim 2:9:4 –  Double AA Dec 26 '11 at 4:51

2 Answers 2

up vote 7 down vote accepted

The Shoel U'meishiv answers that this can be understood based on Rashi's and Tosfos' opinions in Sukkah(41a) where it says that the Third Beis Hamikdash will not be built by hand, rather it will decend from Heaven. There is a principal that the blessing does not come on to something that is empty . For example when Eliyahu Hanavi got oil for Ovdiah's wife and children he asked her first "is there anything left in the house?" and she replied "a little oil." From this oil there was blessing and it filled her and all the neighbors containers and jugs. If she would have had nothing it would not have worked as per this principal. This is also the source for people who during Bentching leave some type of crumbs or foodstuff on the table because you can not receive blessing on the food if there is none there. With this principal explained we now know why we require the Kosel to remain in order for Hashem to send down the third temple, for there has to be somthing here - it can't be empty - because a blessing does not come on to something that is empty .

share|improve this answer
    
Do you mean Elisha? –  Double AA Jul 1 '13 at 20:56

The Zohar writes (2:5b, Parshas Shemos)

תשורי מראש אמנה, מאתר בי מקדשא דלעילא ומאתר בי מקדשא דלתתא, דאמר רבי יהודה, מעולם לא זזה שכינתא מכותלי דמערבא דבי מקדשא, דכתיב: 'הנה זה עומד אחר כתלנו', והוא ראש אמנה לכל עלמא

"Sing from the heights of Mt. Amanah [homiletically referring to 'heights of belief']: From the place of the high temple and the low [earthly] temple, as R. Yehudah says, forever the Shekhinah will not move from the West of the Temple, as the verse states "behold it is standing behind our wall", and this is the heights of belief for all the world"

Thus, the fact that the Western Wall remains standing is meant to be a testimony to faith, because the Shekhinah will not leave from there.

As to why the Western wall, as opposed to any other wall: the Western wall is the wall closest to the area where the "Holiest of Holy" was, the place of the Ark and the Foundation Stone (Even Hashesiyah). See his shiur from R. Levi of Yehivat Har Etzion, where he also explains the relevance of the west being associated with Shekhinah more generally, due to the proximity of the wall to the Holy of Holies and to the fact that the Temple as a whole faced west.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.